Honchkrowabcd wrote:
Thelegendary_ROOK wrote:
if stalemate wasn't invented what would happen if the king can't move anywhere but is not in check
The person getting stalemated should instantly lose
That's dumb
Stalemate was invented by a loser
Sort:
Thelegendary_ROOK wrote:
if stalemate wasn't invented what would happen if the king can't move anywhere but is not in check
Wha'?
Aug 8, 2024
0
#184
Sanjay5963 wrote:
Honchkrowabcd wrote:
Thelegendary_ROOK wrote:
if stalemate wasn't invented what would happen if the king can't move anywhere but is not in check
The person getting stalemated should instantly lose
That's dumb
How, it makes sense. If you can't do anything, you lose
Aug 8, 2024
0
#185
but your not in check, the other player has to move for it to be the other persons turn
Honchkrowabcd wrote:
Sanjay5963 wrote:
Honchkrowabcd wrote:
Thelegendary_ROOK wrote:
if stalemate wasn't invented what would happen if the king can't move anywhere but is not in check
The person getting stalemated should instantly lose
That's dumb
How, it makes sense. If you can't do anything, you lose
Not this again...
Aug 8, 2024
0
#188
@haveyouseencyan, lol, probably your recent opponent pull off stalemate to you wasn't? Imo, your wall of text of an opinion about stalemate is for loser is just a sad excuse, and also stalemate exists with a reason because opponents don't have legal moves to be moved not because you think what it's, do
literally i drew a winning game bcuz of stalemate and enjoyed it bcuz endgame tactics are the best
Aug 8, 2024
0
#191
Sorry about a lot of unfinished sentences above. I accidentally pressed enter button, which functions as sent button, so... 🤷♂️
It's fine
Sanjay5963 wrote:
checkmated0001 wrote:
Do you know what stalemate is?
Excuse me, what kind of a stupid question is that. Everybody knows. I am saying those pictures were not stalemate. If you want to win an argument, argue with your friends that are mentally challenged because of you
Sanjay5963 wrote: imbigbdk wrote: no it is not technically still 1000. those are 2 completely different numbers
Yada yada yada. whatever. At least I don't rate shame people
Mhm. That's good to know.
Aug 8, 2024
0
#194
checkmated0001 wrote:
Sanjay5963 wrote:
checkmated0001 wrote:
Do you know what stalemate is?
Excuse me, what kind of a stupid question is that. Everybody knows. I am saying those pictures were not stalemate. If you want to win an argument, argue with your friends that are mentally challenged because of you
Sanjay5963 wrote: imbigbdk wrote: no it is not technically still 1000. those are 2 completely different numbers
Yada yada yada. whatever. At least I don't rate shame people
Mhm. That's good to know.
Sorry for insulting you
Thank you. And it is a good thing you don't rate shame, a lot of people are surprisingly caught up in their own egos about their elo. It's refreshing to see someone who isn't.
Aug 8, 2024
0
#196
Wow that was a lot of reading (read from 120ish to here) (already read up to 120ish yesterday)
Aug 8, 2024
0
#198
If the game cannot continue... Stalemate is the only thing that makes sense because in order to win you have to deliver checkmate or your opponent has to resign... having more pieces doesn't mean anything 🤣
Aug 8, 2024
0
#199
You cannot capture the king...if you could...I probably wouldn't play chess
if stalemate wasn't invented what would happen if the king can't move anywhere but is not in check
The person getting stalemated should instantly lose