There is a ratings list of 77 Stockfish engines online at http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/
Everything is there, except the one you list. The several Stockfish DD engines listed are 64 bit engines.
stockfish dd rating
Sort:
ILove-mating wrote:
I also use stockfish dd 32 to analyze my tournament games..since my computer is garbage and only capable of using the 32 bit engine. Ive been wondering the same thing, how does stockfish dd 32 compare to the stockfish dd 64 engine?
Depends on the hardware. Running on 12 cores clocked at 4.5ghz it's beast. Than you truly do get close to that 3100 elo
i've noticed ppl prefer an engine with let's say 3100 elo to an engine to 3000 elo, does that make much of a difference in anaylzing one's own games?
David210 wrote:
i've noticed ppl prefer an engine with let's say 3100 elo to an engine to 3000 elo, does that make much of a difference in anaylzing one's own games?
No it's more about having the strongest or best thing, much how people would like a 3.2GHz processor over a 3.1GHz.
For analyzing your own games or pwning humans it's not really a difference. Where it really comes into play is when playing another strong engine where every little bit would count.
This rating has no connection to FIDE rating.
EvgeniyZh wrote:
This rating has no connection to FIDE rating.
Yes that's why it's called ELO rating not FIDE
ChessHammer40k wrote:
EvgeniyZh wrote:
This rating has no connection to FIDE rating.
Yes that's why it's called ELO rating not FIDE
Lol, ELO is name of rating system, FIDE rating is elo too.
EvgeniyZh wrote:
ChessHammer40k wrote:
EvgeniyZh wrote:
This rating has no connection to FIDE rating.
Yes that's why it's called ELO rating not FIDE
Lol, ELO is name of rating system, FIDE rating is elo too.
whatever you say mr my hishest rating is 1200
Till_98 wrote:
Lol? Elo is the rating of FIDE!
The system was adopted by the FIDE and works the same.
In order to determine how FIDE-rating correlates to the ratings of the engines, one would have to have humans playing the engines.
However, Stockfish would perform significantly weaker than other top-engines because of a bug regarding 3-fold-repetition. This does not play a role in engine vs. engine battles, but as a human, who knows the nature of this bug you can exploit it to get Stockfish to draw games very early by 3-fold.
The authors are aware of this bug but they don't fix it because it would make stockfish lose around 1.2 ELO-Points in engine vs. engine play and they don't think that engine vs. human matters at all.
May 18, 2014
0
#13
Apart from this 3-fold repetitions bug, humans have no chance against Stockfish, so a "FIDE rating" of it cannot be calculated.
Aug 19, 2016
0
#14
mcris wrote:
Apart from this 3-fold repetitions bug, humans have no chance against Stockfish, so a "FIDE rating" of it cannot be calculated.
What do you mean humans have no chance against stockfish? I still consider my self a beginner but I've just drawn with stockfish due to its 3 fold repetition bug in a game that I was a pawn ahead
What is rating of stockfish dd 32 ?