Stop ๐Ÿ‘ Randomly ๐Ÿ‘ Challenging ๐Ÿ‘ Higher ๐Ÿ‘ Rated ๐Ÿ‘ Players ๐Ÿ‘ To ๐Ÿ‘ Rated ๐Ÿ‘ Games

Sort:
DoYouLikeCurry

Iโ€™m sure Iโ€™m not the only one who gets this, but every five minutes it seems Iโ€™ve got another challenge from a 500. Occasionally I even accidentally click on the challenge and then have to abort (which I donโ€™t like doing) or play a game for 0 -8 -16. Itโ€™s super annoying and doesnโ€™t endear you to us!

if you want a game, message us first, at least, and then weโ€™ll see if we can have an unrated game, maybe.

But we gain nothing from playing you, and you wonโ€™t learn anything either. So please: just stop.

Rant over, sorry about that, Iโ€™ve been awake for only half an hour and already had three challenges ๐Ÿ˜‚

DalilMod

You can choose the rating range for your opponent, and who can challenge you in your settings.

See here: https://support.chess.com/article/1962-how-do-i-choose-what-rating-my-opponents-are

ice_cream_cake

I understand your feeling of annoyance sad.png So yeah, it's helpful to know the feature described above.
Quick question: I see there is an option "My friends can challenge me no matter what". I assume that means that even friends outside the rating range specified can challenge you? That would be a desired feature to me, just wanted to confirm.

DalilMod

I believe so, you may get a warning message about the rating difference which should not impact sending a challenge.

Kyobir

Same here. I have a 500 rated from who plays at a level similar to mine, so I end up losing a lot of elo (something like +2 for a win, -6 for a draw, -14 for a loss)

ice_cream_cake

Inspired by this post, last night I set my incoming challenges to -400 and above XD

Cobra2721

Ur 1784 ๐Ÿ’€ ur not him

KeSetoKaiba
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:

Iโ€™m sure Iโ€™m not the only one who gets this, but every five minutes it seems Iโ€™ve got another challenge from a 500...

if you want a game, message us first, at least, and then weโ€™ll see if we can have an unrated game, maybe...

This and other reasons (like not wanting a friendly game to be more pressure on their side) is why I typically only play unrated games with chess.com friends. When I play a "friendly" game, I don't want to be taking their rating points (as well as a way of protecting my own rating).

For people much lower rated than me, I still usually give them a game or two for learning purposes though. Rating isn't as important as the person. Besides, I was so thankful when higher rated players accepted my games (mostly when I was much lower rated) and so me now being the higher rated player than most, I return the same favor to the people who want to play against me.

Although, just like you mentioned @DoYouLikeCurry I usually setup unrated games via messages before just accepting a game.

ice_cream_cake

I understand the sentiment that one can try to help out lower rated players, but really it's a favor for them, and i don't think one is obligated to accept a lot of such requests. One can choose how to allocate one's time. I don't get that many random requests but i've taken to the practice of only accepting such requests only if the person and i have had enough interactions that I somewhat trust them, -- similar I guess to both @DoYouLikeCurry and @KeSetoKaiba.

DoYouLikeCurry
Fully agree with lots of you - I should clarify that I do play lower rated players (I even do coaching with some) I just get annoyed when people just randomly challenge me with no context when I have no clue who they are. And itโ€™s always rated.
Blues

[Removed - DB]ย  ur only 1800 u act like a 2500 ๐Ÿ’€

ice_cream_cake
ilya-ssehc wrote:
[Removed - DB]ย  1800 u act like a 2500 ๐Ÿ’€

Well, I don't see how that's relevant when talking about random challenges from beginners

lalata567

I just stop checking my challenges. The only time I check my challenges is if my friends want to play me and then I see like 10 challenges. Please stop itโ€™s starting to get out of hand

DoYouLikeCurry
@ilya-ssehc I think itโ€™s a valid concern to anyone far enough above the rating to get 0elo for the win, no? Iโ€™m well aware thereโ€™s a huge gap between me and titled players. Thatโ€™s why I donโ€™t challenge them to rated games. Do you see what Iโ€™m trying to say?

Also, say what you like being 1800 puts you in the top 0.6% of chess.com so I donโ€™t think itโ€™s unreasonable to refer to us as โ€œhigher rated playersโ€ - as, although we may be considered simply the upper level of intermediate, we are still higher rated than over 99% of the platform.
TarZanIQ-2
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:

Iโ€™m sure Iโ€™m not the only one who gets this, but every five minutes it seems Iโ€™ve got another challenge from a 500. Occasionally I even accidentally click on the challenge and then have to abort (which I donโ€™t like doing) or play a game for 0 -8 -16. Itโ€™s super annoying and doesnโ€™t endear you to us!

if you want a game, message us first, at least, and then weโ€™ll see if we can have an unrated game, maybe.

But we gain nothing from playing you, and you wonโ€™t learn anything either. So please: just stop.

Rant over, sorry about that, Iโ€™ve been awake for only half an hour and already had three challenges ๐Ÿ˜‚

i feel like this is a symptom of taking yourself too seriously, 1800 is not that high rated and i say this as a fellow 1800

ice_cream_cake
TarZanIQ wrote:
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:

Iโ€™m sure Iโ€™m not the only one who gets this, but every five minutes it seems Iโ€™ve got another challenge from a 500. Occasionally I even accidentally click on the challenge and then have to abort (which I donโ€™t like doing) or play a game for 0 -8 -16. Itโ€™s super annoying and doesnโ€™t endear you to us!

if you want a game, message us first, at least, and then weโ€™ll see if we can have an unrated game, maybe.

But we gain nothing from playing you, and you wonโ€™t learn anything either. So please: just stop.

Rant over, sorry about that, Iโ€™ve been awake for only half an hour and already had three challenges ๐Ÿ˜‚

i feel like this is a symptom of taking yourself too seriously, 1800 is not that high rated and i say this as a fellow 1800

Idk, i think it's valid to be bothered. If the difference in rating is over 1000 points it's generally not even an interesting game, so accepting the challenge is purely for the opponent's sake.
I haven't played rated rapid on this account in over two months but my other account is rated higher; I don't consider myself high rated but I still don't like random challenges with no context -- like seriously, at least send me a message and bother to be polite, because I don't trust random people on the internet.

DoYouLikeCurry

Guys omg check out this forum post:

[Removed - DB]

the guy has a 1 day old account and has gone from 18% accuracy to 98% in just one day and is claiming heโ€™s not a chess cheat. Itโ€™s brilliant ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚.

ice_cream_cake

I don't wanna be annoying but tbh, public accusations shouldn't be done....but yeah people are funny lol.......

DoYouLikeCurry
Public accusations suck mostly, but this guy was asking for it after claiming his superior IQ would help him dominate the chess world lmao. Anyway, the real crime is people cheating at chess. Calling them out for it when they stupidly post themselves on forums is just kinda funny I reckon
ice_cream_cake
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:
this guy was asking for it after claiming his superior IQ would help him dominate the chess world lmao

LOL
I agree it's a comical situation when someone boasts about ability they clearly don't have....Someone told me that many cheaters claim to have learned chess from their dad ~ he went something like, "I didn't know Stockfish had that many children".
but still, i guess one should still stick to forum rules