Strategy and the Middlegame is so hard.

Sort:
ChessmanzYT

I don't really know how to improve these areas in my game and I feel I'm constantly making inaccuracies during the middle game. just wandering if any premium member has found a good coarse that helped them improve. I find that people give an example of a game showing you how a game was won with a fabulous outpost but as soon as you play a game with your new found knowledge your back at square one.

llama44

For me it was reading Soltis' Pawn structure chess book, and Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual.

Endgames are an important part of middlegame strategy, because otherwise you don't know which piece trades and structures are favorable, a draw, or impossible.

And then the Soltis book is just a solid strategy book.

llama44

And even though Hikaru was a big dork, recommending Dvoretsky's Endgame book to no one below 2400, it's actually fine. I read it at 1600. If all you learn is the blue diagrams (there are over 200 of them) then you'll learn a lot... and some of the blue diagrams are easy enough for beginners.

goodbye27

@llama44 i've downloaded Soltis' book for pawn structures. It's a big book. I've enlisted and wont be home after june 5th. So i don't have much time left. Any parts can you suggest me to look first?

llama44

Start at the beginning

It's organized by type of structure, so I guess you could start anywhere, but the real benefit of the book isn't any one section, but its collective knowledge. The position types are different, and you learn new things, but at the same time the core ideas are being shown again and again.

goodbye27

All right. thanks. :)

An_asparagusic_acid
Chesfanatic wrote:

I don't really know how to improve these areas in my game and I feel I'm constantly making inaccuracies during the middle game. just wandering if any premium member has found a good coarse that helped them improve. I find that people give an example of a game showing you how a game was won with a fabulous outpost but as soon as you play a game with your new found knowledge your back at square one.

Chess strategy for the tournament player, helped me a lot.

An_asparagusic_acid
llama44 wrote:

For me it was reading Soltis' Pawn structure chess book, and Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual.

Endgames are an important part of middlegame strategy, because otherwise you don't know which piece trades and structures are favorable, a draw, or impossible.

And then the Soltis book is just a solid strategy book.

The real benefit from dvoretsky's endgame manual, comes from the black text.

llama44
An_asparagusic_acid wrote:
llama44 wrote:

For me it was reading Soltis' Pawn structure chess book, and Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual.

Endgames are an important part of middlegame strategy, because otherwise you don't know which piece trades and structures are favorable, a draw, or impossible.

And then the Soltis book is just a solid strategy book.

The real benefit from dvoretsky's endgame manual, comes from the black text.

Yeah yeah, you're a low key troll, whatever

An_asparagusic_acid
llama44 wrote:
An_asparagusic_acid wrote:
llama44 wrote:

For me it was reading Soltis' Pawn structure chess book, and Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual.

Endgames are an important part of middlegame strategy, because otherwise you don't know which piece trades and structures are favorable, a draw, or impossible.

And then the Soltis book is just a solid strategy book.

The real benefit from dvoretsky's endgame manual, comes from the black text.

Yeah yeah, you're a low key troll, whatever

That's where the detailed analysis is, the blue text is enough for casual players, but if you have hopes of becoming a FM, the black text is a must.

llama44

All the black text is more than an FM can handle

But yes, I played over all of it, and it helped because even if you absorb 2% of it, that's something.

An_asparagusic_acid
llama44 wrote:

All the black text is more than an FM can handle

But yes, I played over all of it, and it helped because even if you absorb 2% of it, that's something.

I have dvoretsky's endgame manual, and I read the black text, and I don't have any problems understanding it.

llama44

Being shown a good move, and thinking it's good is one thing... but finding a good move in a sea of potentially good moves during a game is incredibly hard.

An_asparagusic_acid
llama44 wrote:

Being shown a good move, and thinking it's good is one thing... but finding a good move in a sea of potentially good moves during a game is incredibly hard.

After my first 3 seconds of thinking, I already know what move to play. The rest of my thinking time, is trying to prove myself wrong.

llama44

Yeah yeah, you're hiding it less and less...

An_asparagusic_acid
llama44 wrote:

Yeah yeah, you're hiding it less and less...

No, I have a very strong intuition compared to my cognitive chess playing skills. I am not the only one to say this, magnus carlsen says that he knows what move to play in the first few seconds.

llama44

Of course. All chess players say it. That's why it's a trolly comeback.

blueemu
llama44 wrote:

For me it was reading Soltis' Pawn structure chess book...

Kmoch's "Pawn Power in Chess" is what brought my game to a new level. Nimzovich's "My System" gave me a lot to think about, too.

Then there's GM Larry Evans "New Ideas in Chess"... published in 1958, so they are old ideas by now... which gave me an entirely different way of looking at middle-game positions. I summarized some of his key points in this thread:

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/gm-larry-evans-method-of-static-analysis

An_asparagusic_acid
llama44 wrote:

Of course. All chess players say it. That's why it's a trolly comeback.

Are trying to troll me? 

RussBell

Good Positional Chess, Planning & Strategy Books for Beginners and Beyond...

https://www.chess.com/blog/RussBell/introduction-to-positional-chess-planning-strategy