Tell me, what tips do I do to get better at chess?

Sort:
darkunorthodox88

most books are useless if you still blundering pieces left and right. Sounds like you need to still develop your combinational vision. Playing lots of games, and do tactic puzzles. Once you reach a level where your mistakes are not super elementary can you then consider more advanced material .

put in another way, chess improvement is all about improving the quality of your play in critical positions. in master games, it is common for there to be only 3 or 4 of such situations the whole game but as you go down the rating ladder you will find that you will have more critical positions since you are seeing and understanding less. IF you are still blundering pieces left and right, then almost every other move can be a critical position, in which case studying is pound for pound relatively useless. You need to be seeing what you are supposed to see (aka blunders) which means you need to first develop your large pattern recognition base until your blunder alert is second nature. Ideally, you will briefly analyze all your games with or without an engine. tactic books can expedite the process if you do them at the right level. Everything else is minutia till then.

TheCatLoversWillRise
darkunorthodox88 wrote:

most books are useless if you still blundering pieces left and right. Sounds like you need to still develop your combinational vision. Playing lots of games, and do tactic puzzles. Once you reach a level where your mistakes are not super elementary can you then consider more advanced material .

put in another way, chess improvement is all about improving the quality of your play in critical positions. in master games, it is common for there to be only 3 or 4 of such situations the whole game but as you go down the rating ladder you will find that you will have more critical positions since you are seeing and understanding less. IF you are still blundering pieces left and right, then almost every other move can be a critical position, in which case studying is pound for pound relatively useless. You need to be seeing what you are supposed to see (aka blunders) which means you need to first develop your large pattern recognition base until your blunder alert is second nature. Ideally, you will briefly analyze all your games with or without an engine. tactic books can expedite the process if you do them at the right level. Everything else is minutia till then.

Thanks for the tip!

xzib1t7

u rat... u thank the national master but not me? i hope u are stuck under 1000 for ever

CodyK1414
Learn an opening from Gotham chess for black and white I would suggest London and Caro-kaan
TheCatLoversWillRise
xzib1t7 wrote:

u rat... u thank the national master but not me? i hope u are stuck under 1000 for ever

Uh okay...

JustCallMeChameleon

LOL

JustCallMeChameleon

xzitb7 so funny

TheCatLoversWillRise
JustCallMeChameleon wrote:

xzitb7 so funny

nuh uh

JustCallMeChameleon

but I-i-ii-i-i-i-i- th-ough-t L