The long road to chess improvement

Sort:
the_chess_zebra

First, I want to thank all my opponents, who have played a game or several games, with me.  You are all my teachers.

Secondly, in the beginning, I played chess just for recreation.  My father taught me when I was very little.  He was a great chess player (with a last name of Fisher even wink.png)

This week has been rather special for me.  I've finally managed to reach my first milestone - to reach the 1000 rating and hang onto it. 

Y'all can laugh now... I'll wait for the merriment to quiet down...

One thing that has helped me is to focus on one simple opening.  Learn how to play it in White (and not play it).  That taught me discipline.  Once I figured out how the opening works and all it's variations, I could focus on the opponent's defense.  Many different defenses were presented by some very clever players, some effective and some not.  It also allowed me to think way beyond my current move and look at the board for lots of possibilities.  I tried things.  Some worked, some were disastrous.  But along the way, I learned - sometimes learning the hard way.

After I got the feel of the opening and mastered the discipline to set up my moves carefully, I used the mirror image of the opening to play Black.  It felt weird at first.  I had to be more careful setting up the pieces.  And I lost quite a few games until I started to get the hang of it.  The most interesting thing about the Black opening is that it required a lot of analyzing what the opponent was doing and often, I felt blocked.   So, I learned to look for holes, trying to set up a situation where I could zoom in for checkmate that the opponent could not defend.  It was interesting...  to say the least.

Yes, I lost a lot of games trying to learn this opening.  I also learned not to care about my rating because a little voice in my head said, "When you figure it out, your rating will improve."

I wrestled with this opening for at least a year.  I didn't crack a chess book because my free time is very limited.  Instead, I tried to remember some words of wisdom passed down from my dad in those formative years when I was too little to grasp it all. 

This year, my rating stayed a strong 800.  Then, a couple weeks or so ago, it went to 900.  I'd been there before - briefly - but this time, it stayed there.  And much to my total amazement, it shot up to 1000.  I'd been there before too - very very briefly.

It's been said on chess.com that players at the 1000 level cheat, it's harder to beat some of them than at the 1200 level, and blah blah.  Maybe it's true.  I think if people are going to cheat, they will do it at any level.

I broke the 1000 rating barrier on June 8th.  Two days later, I'm still there.  Don't know how it will proceed, but after a few games, I plan to finally open the chess book I bought a few years ago and start reading when I have a few minutes here 'n there.  And who knows?  Maybe a year or two from now, I'll progress at a faster pace.

My point is simply this:  We all play chess for different reasons.  I read a lot of posts from beginners who are feeling hopeless, people who want to know how to improve their game, people who are fed and quit.  Everyone is different.  But we're all in this together as one big community here on chess. come.  And I'm living proof that if you persist and don't give up, your rating will improve over time.  Hopefully, you won't need 18,000 games to get there wink.png

Tonight,  I'm going to celebrate my chess achievement with a shot of Royal Salut !!!

Thanks for reading my post & here's my baby guinea pig, Cestmir ("Fortress") wishing y'all a nice day...

GGuessMyName

You played 18000 games? That's an insane amonunt!

the_chess_zebra

Chess.com got me through 2 years of Finnish language class, which met 6 hours a day, 5 days a week, and ended up being a total waste of time.

Chess.com got me through graduate school, which was a good use of time.

Chess.com got me through a few years of remodelling - it's one of the 3 top marriage killers.  Thanks to chess, I beat my head against the keyboard instead of taking my frustrations out on my significant other.

Chess.com got me through a crisis when my prize collection of longhair guinea pigs were attacked by Bordetella Septicus, a zoonotic illness with a very high mortality rate.  Thanks to talented researchers and my highly skilled veterinarian, I only lost 22% of my herd and 8 babies.

Chess.com has been there for 10-minute coffee breaks, late at night when I can't sleep, and now it's become something that I have decided to make a serious challenge.  I don't know if it will take another 18,000 games to crack 1200 - which is my next goal - but let's see... happy.png

blueemu

If you take the quest for improvement seriously, going from 1000 to 1200 should be no problem.

hareboll
First off, congrats! Also glad chess has gotten you through some tough times.

Also, take everything I’m about to say with a grain of salt because I’m only in the 1500-1600ish range, I.e. not a GM.

But I looked at some of your games and watched in horror as you left some pieces hanging that I would have devoured, even in games you won. I also saw on your stats that it doesn’t look like you’ve done any puzzles in four years. My unsolicited advice would be to focus less on the opening (I saw you do kings gambit, which btw I don’t think is much in vogue with gm’s nowadays), and wayyyy more on tactics.

I think the opening effort is kinda silly if ten moves in you move your queen right onto a spot where a pawn could take it for free. (Saw that in a recent game). Also do you analyze the games after? I’d recommend it.


But also, glad you’re having fun! And not everybody NEEDS to improve. Sometimes it’s fun to just play
blueemu
hareboll wrote:
... (I saw you do kings gambit, which btw I don’t think is much in vogue with gm’s nowadays)...

Chess players seem to be as fashion-conscious as teenage girls.

BlindThief

Way to go, OP. I toiled between 1100 and 1250 for about two years. Then, may rating just started going up (it’s at 1550 now, but this climb started a year ago). What I did was:

1. was more tactics

2. I really beat myself up mentally over hanging pieces, even if my opponent missed the capture.

3. I reviewed a lot of games, wins and losses. I made it a point to avoid blunders, particularly the sort in number 2 that just gave pieces.

4. I learned basic king (and piece) and king+pawn endgames. The first chapter of Jesus De La Villa’s 100 you must know.

5. I started paying attention to square colors more. For example, a knight or bishop cannot fork or skewer your king and another piece if they are on different color squares. The queen also has a little more difficulty giving a quick check if it’s on a different color square than your king.

Jenium

Hyvää huomenta and congrats. Don't worry. If you managed to improve in Finish, you'll improve in chess in no time.

 

MarkGrubb

Congratulations. The Kings Gambit is rakish and will attract quite a crowd. Wear it loud and proud. GMs today are far to conservative for such a statement.

the_chess_zebra

Thanks to everyone for your tips, words of encouragement, and sharing your experiences. 

More tactics for sure.