This guy showboated a little too much. This is why I never resign.


@aktripathi001 miniatures only please wink.png

Firstcomment wrote:

  Chess is 67 percent not losing.  He knows this, do you?

I just saw this where I got That's sort of stupid. HE knows this?? Who ever said chess is about not losing didn't intend for players to throw away winning games. I know this. He obviously didn't. Do you?

Enderman1323 wrote:
h4_explosive wrote:
Enderman1323 wrote:
h4_explosive wrote:
MickinMD wrote:

Your opponent wasn't "showboating," he was trying to humiliate you as much as possible. What a jerk!

he only wanted to humilliate him in order to show him that he should have resigned a long time ago, which is absolutely correct. the fact that he got lucky with a stalemate doesn't change that at all

I'm sorry? Did I say anything about the stalemate?

What's that? No

Then don't bring it up

You only refute an argument I never made because you know the one I did make is too strong for you to refute.

errrm  sorry, are you a bit stupid? I wasn't even quoting you lol

oops. it's still a stupid argument though

I accept your apology happy.png


White had mate-in-1 on move 37 and chose to ignored it - violating the spirit of chess, insulting Caissa.   Not winning is a suitable consequence.  


It would have been nice if they lost on time too tongue.png


That was hilarious... You definitely deserved the win, or at least the fighting chance...