Chess is 67 percent not losing. He knows this, do you?
I just saw this where I got gifted...lol. That's sort of stupid. HE knows this?? Who ever said chess is about not losing didn't intend for players to throw away winning games. I know this. He obviously didn't. Do you?
Your opponent wasn't "showboating," he was trying to humiliate you as much as possible. What a jerk!
he only wanted to humilliate him in order to show him that he should have resigned a long time ago, which is absolutely correct. the fact that he got lucky with a stalemate doesn't change that at all
I'm sorry? Did I say anything about the stalemate?
What's that? No
Then don't bring it up
You only refute an argument I never made because you know the one I did make is too strong for you to refute.
errrm sorry, are you a bit stupid? I wasn't even quoting you lol
oops. it's still a stupid argument though
I accept your apology 
White had mate-in-1 on move 37 and chose to ignored it - violating the spirit of chess, insulting Caissa. Not winning is a suitable consequence.
It would have been nice if they lost on time too 
@aktripathi001 miniatures only please