Tired of theory? Want to win easily? Play 1. b4 and hope your opponent blunders!
Nothing wrong with that , especially in blitz.
#2 game number 2 he didn't blunder , but all it took just 4 book moves to convert a quite simple win, so ?
What's your point? This thread is helpful for beginners who constantly don't know what opening to play, so your suggestion is to show them games with 25 theory moves where opponents didn't blunder is that what you want?
Why are 2000 players blundering/premoves on move 2?.... Plus Magnus did play 1. b4 recently so it deserves respect... The fact it has a negative win rate in classical master games dosen't really imply anything on how effective it is for online blitz and rapid, and if you are looking at online blitz and rapid stats, then most people can't hold the challenging middlegame that arises from less theoretical openings, and are experimenting with it anyways... I know for example I don't have the accuracy needed to hold a small advantage in very sharp double edged positions... most of the time...