Typical advice given to beginners you all disagree with most

Sort:
sheetspread3
dannyhume wrote:
 Others say do a little bit of each.

Tactics and endgame analysis are the most instructive, but you must study your games as well and learn openings! Maybe even in that order, but do what works for you.

Dsmith42

Castling early is one I've learned is no good.  Having the option to castle - waiting until it really foils the opponent's plan of attack - is much better.  My games often feature tactical, late game castling.

 

The main issue is that most folks steer beginners towards "safe" play, but in chess there really is no such thing.  The best defense is a fast and efficient attack.  Nothing is worse than waiting for a better, more experienced player to pick apart your position.  The only thing you might learn from it is how to pick apart someone else's position later, and if you don't play attacking chess, you'll never have the opportunity to apply that lesson.

BronsteinPawn

All general advise is wrong. 

sheetspread3
BronsteinPawn wrote:

All general advise is wrong. 

For the most part

ShaoniHiya
666Buffchix wrote:

Haven't you seen my comments on this site.."Beginners MUST ONLY play e4 OPEN games" has to be the winner of all eternity.

I disagree d4 is good too

wayne_thomas

Dutch IM Willy Hendricks has a book Move First, Think Later.

sheetspread3
666Buffchix wrote:
sheetspread3 wrote:
666Buffchix wrote:

Haven't you seen my comments on this site.."Beginners MUST ONLY play e4 OPEN games" has to be the winner of all eternity.

 

I wouldn't say must, but mostly, yes. Save the queen pawn openings etc. for experimental days.

 

To be clear I am not advocating queen pawn openings either. The #chessorthodoxy is really at critical mass these days. Sounds like people voting between 2 major parties in an election. It is possible to reject the so-called conventional wisdom and explore other options, yet the chess orthodocks act like it is between boring fuddy duddy choices A and B. Now then, which would you like for dinner, cold spam or warm catfood pate?

Even though king pawn openings are better, you should practice the queen's gambit, english, etc. to learn the theory (i.e. how to counter it!)

sheetspread3
wayne_thomas wrote:

Dutch IM Willy Hendricks has a book Move First, Think Later.

That's one extreme, the other is overanalyze to the point of error. Balance needn't be directly in the middle, but it's far from each end.

dannyhume
Move first, think later... That might sort of occasionally work if you have accumulated 20,000 hours of chess practice time with good feedback.
AIM-AceMove

Dont play by rules. Start making own rules. Thats how i play.

AIM-AceMove
AIM-AceMove wrote:

Dont play by rules. Start making own rules. Thats how i play.

Followed all the rules before didnt get me anywhere, except one rule dont move pieces twice, but i broke it , now playing alekhine defense.Started to study openings , tactics and now im 2000 blitz.

I feel really strong. Toying with lower rated, taking down even title players ocassionally.

Outplaying simular rated with piece dow. Im awesome.

AIM-AceMove
hellopl4y wrote:
I disagree that beginner not to study opening. You can found that players of this website are very strong in opening. You can fall to lost position before 10 moves if you don’t study opening.

Totally agree. Player can easily fell for a trap or a position he might be very weak, even if he follows opening principles and that will repeat until he starts to study them.