Vladimir Kramnik's Hypocrisy

Money, ego, etc. Same as anyone else.

Monorail!

KRAMNIK IS JUST A BORED RETIRED G.M WHO NEEDS SOME ATTENTION SO DECIDES TO CREATE SOME REDICULOUS THEORY THAT HIKARU IS NOT WINNING HIS GAMES FAIRLY, ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS, IF I WAS IN HIKARU POSITION WOULD SLAP HIM WITH A LAW SUIT TO SHUT THE SILLY G.M UP!!!?

Ok

Counterpoint: they are definitely trolling.

Kramnik is deleting more and more comments now. I imagine he must be scrolling through the comments during meals and while using the bathroom, angrily deleting anything that doesn't pay tribute to the pure genius of his claims.

That's obviously satire, but before there were hundreds upon hundreds of comments on his previous blogs, and in his post "On Resent Hysteria", well over 100 were left untouched. Yet, in his most recent post "Data Science Task", he's locked it within a few hours and deleted EVERY SINGLE COMMENT BUT 4! I guess he couldn't find anything other than 2 posts he hasn't wrote supporting him. But he's gotten tired of dissent so I wouldn't waste much time commenting on his blog when all our thoughts can be posted HERE in the forums.

Anyways, here's an example of 2 comments he's deleted. One I just disagreed with a rando on the extent of online cheating and got strawmnaned. and in the other, I called Kramnik out as a liar because we've compiled tons of posts here that showcase his deceit on what he deletes and how he covers it up by... Shockingly (who could've guessed) deleting comments calling him out on this. And still, none of this violates the rules mentioned in post 1 here, which just seem to be "Don't be vulgar", "don't spread misinformation", and don't use data or numbers to prove how much my take's off here."

These comments come from the blog "Crazy to suspect or the opposite? New statistics" (I think it's that one at least it's not like I can check lol.)

Sent an quoted message to gothem chess was funny. He's worse than a patzer compared to these guys. His opinion at best means nothing.

Kramnik deleting comments. Is no worse than hikarua agree with stats he can't even understand. Just agrees blindly because the clips favour him.

Also hikarua would be cheering at extra revenue that this shit brings him.

https://www.chess.com/member/htl1966 has posted some excellent statistical analysis on this matter. I suggest anyone who is interested take a look

https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/1819109/insightful_comment_from_kramniks_blog_by/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&c3

this is also worth looking

both of these have been deleted by kramnik.

These links are some analysis to the statistics of hikaru's win streaks

Kramnik strongly suspects that I am a member of chess.com's PR team. Good to know.

Here's the message he is responding to:

I suppose Kramnik is spending a great amount of time and energy defending his obscure and irrational accusations against hikaru. However, when others are defending their own view, it's 'working for the platform'. Using this logic, is he working for a anti-Hikaru platform?

Hard to believe such a irrational self centered person gets this much respect on the internet that he doesn't deserve

No. I was calling him out for lying about it and using these standards as an excuse to delete opinions he dislikes. And in the field of statistics, it's not like he has enough knowledge to determine whether or not something is accurate in terms of data and statistics analysis.

And in future, I'd advise learning how to read. Because your comprehension of my post was laughable.

Neither cheated. Magnus Carlsen's accusation against Hans Neimman was equally ridiculous and baseless. Magnus has lost to multiple 2500s this year in those two major tournaments, and has gotten alot of draws against players he normally used to win streak. No evidence he cheated in an OTB game. It is literally more likely Hikaru cheated in an online blitz game than Hans did in an OTB game.

since you have a bit of brain, use mathematics to show hikaru is cheating