We should kill the king
Sort:
nutatlakmxn
22 days ago
0
#21
Yeah I wonder if you should actually have to capture the king like when we play we put the king in danger but never take it…….”I’m from Central African Republic”🇨🇫
22 days ago
0
#22
You could introduce a new "French Revolution" variant, where the game doesn't end until you kill the King.
Call it Robespierre Chess.
The checkmate icon shows the King on its side, that may mean it is actually killed. Also, when resigning over the board, usually you throw your King on the side, so it may mean something similar to that occurs.
22 days ago
0
#24
You can’t eliminate stalemate!!! Without it what would you do if you got in a stalemate??
Chess2408Master wrote:
You can’t eliminate stalemate!!! Without it what would you do if you got in a stalemate??
u lose
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
Chess2408Master wrote:
You can’t eliminate stalemate!!! Without it what would you do if you got in a stalemate??
u lose
Which side would lose? Both?
22 days ago
0
#28
lfPatriotGames wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
Chess2408Master wrote:
You can’t eliminate stalemate!!! Without it what would you do if you got in a stalemate??
u lose
Which side would lose? Both?
Probably the stalemated player would lose, since they'd be forced to move into check on the next turn.