Weird Situation of check but not actually

Sort:
Avatar of AmShanks
What may happen if we protect a check by coming in between the way and also simultaneously targeting the opponent king, can he make another move and not move his king or protect it as we can't actually attack him
Avatar of Ubik42
Check is check, makes no difference at all if the checking piece is pinned.
Avatar of Alramech
AmShanks wrote:
What may happen if we protect a check by coming in between the way and also simultaneously targeting the opponent king, can he make another move and not move his king or protect it as we can't actually attack him

Along with @Ubik42 's comment, you can think about it this way: if your piece is pinned to your king but is attacking the other person's king, who gets their king captured first?

 

Avatar of AmShanks

[Site "Chess.com"] [Date "2021-10-17"] [White "AmShanks"] [Black "Opponent"] [Result "*"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "8/8/k3q3/8/8/2Q5/2P5/3K4 b - - 4 12"] 12... Qd6+ 13. Qd3+ *

Avatar of AmShanks

oh I can't link it :(

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
AmShanks wrote:

oh I can't link it :(

 

 

Your options when checked are:

  • Move out of check
  • Interpose a piece between the king and the checking piece
  • Take the checking piece

In that example, white interposed and checked the black king in the process, so black has the exact same options, but only two are legal; moving the king and taking the checking piece

 

Had black checked on d5 or d7 instead, interposing would have also been possible

Avatar of NikkiLikeChikki
Pinning is irrelevant with check. It’s even more complicated: you can deliver checkmate with two pieces, say a queen and bishop, even if the bishop is pinned. You would think the king could take the queen because the bishop cannot take back due to the pin, but the rule is that the king cannot, under any circumstances, make a move that puts them in check. Ever. Not even if the piece is pinned.