What accuracy % do you consider a “good” game?
Sort:
stancco wrote:
What a joke
70 or above
Eclipscius wrote:
stancco wrote:What a joke
70 or above
Oh no, it wasn't a quote to your comment.
The whole concept is pointless. It depends on position. If your opponent blunders he would make it easier for you to score higher result. Therefore, it mainly depends on the opponent (and the position), but to be honest, to SOME extent also on your skill level. As an example, I win random queen vs rook position with 95 to 100% even against the strongest stock fish level. I doubt every grandmaster could achieve the same result playing the same endgame against me.
Jun 7, 2023
0
#287
Optimissed wrote:
blueemu wrote:
FrogboyWarpz wrote:
98 is good, really anything above 90 should be considered good
Notice in that print-out - a 31-move insanely complex tactical melee, with pieces literally being sacriced back and forth by both players, and I played ONE move that wasn't either Book, Best, Great or Brilliant.
I know, I know, and now you can't hold your head up for the shame of it.
It's a good thing I'm not Japanese, or I might be expected to commit seppuku.
... dodged a bullet THERE!
Jul 10, 2023
0
#288
20-30% - Never gotten
30% - 40% - Never gotten
40% - 50% - Never gotten
50% - 60% - Horrible game. If I played this badly, I either pulled and all-nighter, was out of my mind, or was in a slump.
60% - 70% - I don't feel good about these. I usually play at this accuracy in games with very tricky openings I've never seen before or just complicated positions.
70% - 80% - Meh. I don't mind this. I've played well but I could play better
80% - 90% - Good. This is an average accuracy for games I won through tactics.
90% - 100% Amazing. I usually get this accuracy when I positionally crush my opponenets.
Important to know that a 90% accuracy at 700 is a lot less impressive than 90% at 2000
Jul 10, 2023
0
#289
I’m normally happy 82 and above? Maybe 84 and above? But if it was a more complex middlegame I’m happy for that to fall
101%
Jul 11, 2023
0
#291
I played a game where my opponent played the Giuoco Piano. His 4th move was Ng5. Of course, I took the knight with my queen. Two moves later, he resigned. My accuracy was 100. My opponent was 51.7. It said I played to a rating of 2350 and he was 900. I'm really not proud of that game.
Jul 11, 2023
0
#293
over 93 or so, below that i feel disgusted unless its like hyper or smth, in bullet or longer if i dont get over 90 im depressed
I got 97.6 for a game 👍
And I’m 600 elo 😂
Jul 29, 2023
0
#297
if both players play at least at 75%, with the focus on both & if the game is about 30-50 moves
other than that, if i'm just talking about my gameplay, i'd say 85% i'm happy with
Jul 30, 2023
0
#298
I consider anything above 90% accuracy OK. Usually when I play a game, I get around 92% accuaracy
I conistently hit 83-93% and around that, cause i started questioning myself critically at every move and my rating improved from 200 to 700 in a week, i wanna reach 1000 before summer ends, and maybe try to boost up my rating on game reviews
What a joke