What accuracy % do you consider a “good” game?


I played a game where my opponent played the Giuoco Piano. His 4th move was Ng5. Of course, I took the knight with my queen. Two moves later, he resigned. My accuracy was 100. My opponent was 51.7. It said I played to a rating of 2350 and he was 900. I'm really not proud of that game.

over 93 or so, below that i feel disgusted unless its like hyper or smth, in bullet or longer if i dont get over 90 im depressed

if both players play at least at 75%, with the focus on both & if the game is about 30-50 moves
other than that, if i'm just talking about my gameplay, i'd say 85% i'm happy with

I conistently hit 83-93% and around that, cause i started questioning myself critically at every move and my rating improved from 200 to 700 in a week, i wanna reach 1000 before summer ends, and maybe try to boost up my rating on game reviews

With a 80% score I am satisfied. With 85% i know i played a solid, very clean game. At 90% or higher I must have been clinical, and that doesn't happen often.
i got my first diamond move with 363 elo https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/81870872116?tab=review&move=46
20-30% - Never gotten
30% - 40% - Never gotten
40% - 50% - Never gotten
50% - 60% - Horrible game. If I played this badly, I either pulled and all-nighter, was out of my mind, or was in a slump.
60% - 70% - I don't feel good about these. I usually play at this accuracy in games with very tricky openings I've never seen before or just complicated positions.
70% - 80% - Meh. I don't mind this. I've played well but I could play better
80% - 90% - Good. This is an average accuracy for games I won through tactics.
90% - 100% Amazing. I usually get this accuracy when I positionally crush my opponenets.
Important to know that a 90% accuracy at 700 is a lot less impressive than 90% at 2000