What color hijab did Alexandra Kosteniuk wear today?

Sort:
llama
urk wrote:
Islamists want you personally DEAD for your sins?

Not all of them are genocidal maniacs.

Religion is definitely dangerous though. People are too tolerant of religion for my taste.

Firstplay

I think we can all now see that urk has no real interest in female headgear but has used it to launch an attack on Islam.  Universityofpawns, we don't live in a democracy, just the pretence of one, but that's another discussion.

Firstplay

and I've a few Moslem friends who fight fascists, alongside the rest of us, when they dare appear on our streets.

Firstplay

Maybe we should go back to asking why other religions, considered more western, also expect certain dress and customs to be respected by everyone.  Like why should we have twelve unelected bishops in our house of lords; who do they represent?  God maybe? 

kayak21
Firstplay wrote:

.....and Govts try to divide us.  Racism, xenophobia and religious differences being some of their favoured tools.

........and two of your favoured words.

Firstplay
urk wrote:
I didn't vote for Trump and I was demonstrating in the streets against Bush's stupid and illegal invasion of Iraq while most of you pansies were too busy playing videogames.

Bit presumptious urk.  How do you know what anyone was doing?  Have you got a magic crystal ball or something?  I'm glad you protested against the war, and Bush, and glad you don't support Buzzlightyear, but you have a strange way of making allies.  Attacking one particular religion is what the Right engage in as a way of dividing people.

Firstplay
kayak21 wrote:
Firstplay wrote:

.....and Govts try to divide us.  Racism, xenophobia and religious differences being some of their favoured tools.

........and two of your favoured words.

and here's 'Yacky' with her usual childish insults.  This is a grown up discussion yacky; keep up.

llama

If you believe in a religion then most (or all) other religions are lies. People living their whole lives with their core beliefs anchored in falsehood.

If you're not religious, then all religions are lies.

I don't know why religion is respected... well I do, it's out of convenience, but I think it would be better if it weren't. Maybe a better word than respect is tolerate. People tolerate it.

Firstplay
2Q1C wrote:

I think he is standing up for a cause which he believes in which is commendable but I don't think he understands the argument from a muslims perspective.

I wouldn't bother trying reasonable debate with yacky, she'd cause trouble in an empty house!! Laughing  I think I do understand things from a Moslem perspective as one of my best friends has that faith. I don't like any religion as it's divisive and frankly a load of nonesense.  However, if people want to 'believe' then they can; it's up to them.

What I don't accept is attacks on one religion as a diversion for the West's military aims.  Isn't that what Hitler did?  Scapegoating a minority?  We've a lot more to worry about from 'our own' religions, predominantly christian of different hues.  The bigotry that exists here can be terrible, not to mention the numbers of clergy involved in sexual exploitation of children.

urk
Firstplay, I no longer believe in Right vs Left. But I do believe in Good vs Evil.

And I see a lot of misguided support of Evil.
llama

To me religion is the ultimate example of how frail humans are intellectually. Grown adults who truly believe in fairy tales.

"Now wait a minute, you can't say that about MY religion!"

Ok, then pretend I'm only saying it about the ones you don't believe in. No matter your religion, most people don't believe in it. Most people believe in fairy tales. We should all be able to agree on that.

llama

I mean, how is that not intellectually offensive to people?

The answer is people don't have much regard for intellect. People don't have much regard for facts and truth. If it makes you happy, then that's good enough.

llama
urk wrote:
Firstplay, I no longer believe in Right vs Left. But I do believe in Good vs Evil.

And I see a lot of misguided support of Evil.

Just be careful when you start thinking in terms of "my side" is entirely and unequivocally Good and "their side" is entirely and unequivocally Evil. That's a strong sign of delusion no matter who you are or what you believe in. Just saying.

llama
2Q1C wrote:
Telestu wrote:

To me religion is the ultimate example of how frail humans are intellectually. Grown adults who truly believe in fairy tales.

"Now wait a minute, you can't say that about MY religion!"

Ok, then pretend I'm only saying it about the ones you don't believe in. No matter your religion, most people don't believe in it. Most people believe in fairy tales. We should all be able to agree on that.

 

To me people calling humans "intellectual" is an example of how frail our species is. We know nothing. Nothing that matters anyway. We are an animal. We all have to eat food, drink water then shit and piss it out. You're not special. You're going to die. 

That's the other extreme, and I don't agree with that either. Humans DO  have some knowledge. The proof is everywhere in modern life: planes, computers, medicine, etc.

Firstplay

Maybe the word indoctrination could be used here somewhere...?

kayak21
Firstplay wrote:
kayak21 wrote:
Firstplay wrote:

.....and Govts try to divide us.  Racism, xenophobia and religious differences being some of their favoured tools.

........and two of your favoured words.

and here's 'Yacky' with her usual childish insults.  This is a grown up discussion yacky; keep up.

You're the one being childish with the soppy name calling. Shame I can't print the name I call you. You've worn out your copy & paste buttons, you missed out homophobia in your previous post.

llama
2Q1C wrote:

 Yes but whats the point in some knowledge? In 100 years time everyone of us here will be dead and nothing any of us did will have mattered in the grand scheme of things. As it stands, we are all in this trench together. Can't we all just get along until that big ball of fire in the sky gives out? Even if it means wearing a scarf for a chess tournament?

Sure, I wouldn't mind that. If the most cherished values involved small community (family, friends, neighbors) and you eat food with friends until you die, that's great. Even in this case though knowledge is useful. It gives us more food, and less disease for example.

As the social circle grows though, I guess things get more complicated. It's not in our nature to be empathetic towards the bigger circles such as society, other societies, humanity, and all living things. To navigate that we need knowledge to e.g. set up functioning governments and deal with criminals effectively.

And again, wearing a scarf to a chess tournament is trivially non-controversial. The controversy is in what it may represent.

llama

Well, I guess because we aren't very smart, instead of using knowledge for those roles, we (at least traditionally) used fairy tales. Living things are nothing if not pragmatic. It obviously worked.

I guess my gripe is how awkward it seems from a modern perspective, where we've reached the point that these things are possible with facts instead of imagination. So you ask me "is it really that important?" Well, ideologies carry a lot of baggage. They make good people do bad things. And if we focus on true knowledge we can improve the quality of life even more.

Firstplay

I don't want to derail urk but Left and Right are very different. The Right are always on the side of the mighty, the wealthy and powerful. The Right usually use diversionary tactics to divide their numerically mightier opposition, and even win some over with false slogans such as 'national socialism'.  However, I'll say no more on this. 

Evil is a word usually used by religious people, against other people of different religions strangely enough.  It's one of the many reasons I don't like religion.  'How many fairies can be balanced on a pinhead' is the standard of argument between religious people.  Can you underdstand why so many of us switch off?

danfer91
TRextastic wrote:
urk wrote:
New York doesn't require a religious dress code. What a stupid argument.

They do require a dress code though. And most of US customs and laws are founded in religious practices.

 

No, US customs and laws are founded on the principles of the enlightenment, not religion. Religion didn't become a serious part of US politics until around the 1930's. There's a very good book about it by a Princeton historian named Kevin Kruse if you're interested. There are also numerous quotes by the founding fathers that make it quite clear how little our government is inspired by Christianity. The Treaty of Tripoli is probably the most famous, signed by then-president John Adams, which states that "The Government of the United States of America is in no way founded on the Christian religion". The majority of the founders were in fact deists and not Christians. It's why we have the protection of the free exercise of religion outlined in the first amendment. I'm wondering, what laws and customs in the United States are founded on religious practices? Where did you learn this?

This forum topic has been locked