What do you think of the transvestite attack? Could Carlsen beat an IM with it you think?

Sort:
Ashvapathi

No, there is no clear advantage in the position you showed. This position looks similar to London or colle(btw, I would put out my bishop before playing E3). And in London, it quite common to keep king in the centre.

Ashvapathi

Why play this? 

Novelty...surprise factor.

Ashvapathi

Well, there is no surprise anymore for you. I will wait sometime before trying against you.tongue.png

Ashvapathi

Oh, another reason to play such openings is to sharpen your play. It's a good training method.

Ashvapathi
BobbyTalparov wrote:
Ashvapathi wrote:

No, there is no clear advantage in the position you showed. This position looks similar to London or colle(btw, I would put out my bishop before playing E3). And in London, it quite common to keep king in the centre.

No clear advantage? Black has a development lead and white cannot castle. Those seem pretty clear advantages to me.

It's pretty common in many asymmetric openings for one side(generally white) to get some development lead, but it doesn't translate into any real advantage. As for castling, I think there are mainlines in some respected openings where castling is voluntorily given up. If I remember correctly, then bogo indian is one such opening. Kings Gambit also has such lines.

Ashvapathi

Oh, I just played one more game with this opening as black. And I won. It was hard, but not unplayable. It is definitely harder to play as black. 

Ashvapathi

Lichess post game analysis shows +2.5 after 7 moves. So, white had clear advantage. I was playing as black. But after 15 moves, it shows +0.3 which means black equalized.

Ashvapathi

It's like athletes training by running in sand or running with load tied behind. 

Ashvapathi

Diedre,

You know that's the biggest drawback of chess coaching. Coaches and books tell beginners and intermediate players to play safe and sound. The problem is that when they are in a real game where things get messy, they don't know what to do. They never develop those attacking or defensive skills because they play 'correct' chess. Coaches should tell their students to play gambits. Sac pieces. Try out different openings. All that will develop chess skills much better and faster than playing 'correct' chess.

yureesystem
LeonSKennedy992 wrote:
DeirdreSkye wrote:

    You consider this a smart question?

Answering you in another post:Unfortunately chessplayers are not as smart as they should be.Posts like that prove it. 

The Transvestite opening is actually really sound and hard to refute, despite the loss of 3 tempo......

Would you like to play a game with me, sir? I will play this opening.  2 minutes,1 sec delay time control

 

 

I respect Leon, she has a otb rating and she a strong player over 1800. I might not like her opening selection but she plays to win and she has some undertstanding about the game.  

 

  Deirdre,you are different, you have not proven you have a otb rating and players like you playing the Hippo attack, you are afraid to play real opening and like close opening to avoid tactics. Amateur who play the Hippo attack lack chess understanding, they avoid open game 1.e4 because it require real skill to handle these opening; not some lazy hippo attack setup you can do in your sleep. 

You say you play Leon three games but I see any games you played her. She challenge you two games, maybe you are afraid she beat you in the Transvestite Attack. happy.png Or you can't play your boring hippo attack. Yawn!

yureesystem
DeirdreSkye wrote:
yureesystem wrote:
LeonSKennedy992 wrote:
DeirdreSkye wrote:

    You consider this a smart question?

Answering you in another post:Unfortunately chessplayers are not as smart as they should be.Posts like that prove it. 

The Transvestite opening is actually really sound and hard to refute, despite the loss of 3 tempo......

Would you like to play a game with me, sir? I will play this opening.  2 minutes,1 sec delay time control

 

 

I respect Leon, she has a otb rating and she a strong player over 1800. I might not like her opening selection but she plays to win and she has some undertstanding about the game.  

 

  Deirdre,you are different, you have not proven you have a otb rating and players like you playing the Hippo attack, you are afraid to play real opening and like close opening to avoid tactics. Amateur who play the Hippo attack lack chess understanding, they avoid open game 1.e4 because it require real skill to handle these opening; not some lazy hippo attack setup you can do in your sleep. 

You say you play Leon three games but I see any games you played her. She challenge you two games, maybe you are afraid she beat you in the Transvestite Attack.  Or you can't play your boring hippo attack. Yawn!

   Thank you for not respecting me.That  would make me shoot myself.

p.s.  You are either very stupid or Leon's other account.Noone else except a stupid or Leon can feel respect for Leon.

 

 

We are not talking about her other accounts but your credentials as a chess player. What is your otb  rating, Leon is over 1800 uscf. You always express yourself as a expert on chess in all areas but you lack the credentials; any amateur who play the hippo attack lack chess understanding..

LeonSKennedy992

People, people.....lighten up.

Ohohihohoh

carlsen won some nice games with the transvestite in the lichess titles arena nine : )!

 

Im_just_bad

LeonSKennedy992 wrote:
DeirdreSkye wrote:

    You consider this a smart question?

Answering you in another post:Unfortunately chessplayers are not as smart as they should be.Posts like that prove it. 

The Transvestite opening is actually really sound and hard to refute, despite the loss of 3 tempo......

Would you like to play a game with me, sir? I will play this opening.  2 minutes,1 sec delay time control

 

congrandolor

Deirdre: I watched Simon Williams beating a IM (or it was a GM?) with this stuff, go to youtube and check it if you don't believe me

NikolaiSpongnikov
It looks pretty gay
Ohohihohoh
lllNUKElll wrote:

 

I don't understand why this is called a Transvetite attack... I mean it is transvetite but its not an attack; I mean White is perfectly loosing here...

 

 

 

I think its sarcasm.

jatait47
Ashvapathi wrote:

But I don't like the name of this opening. It deserves a better name.


It's a very appropriate name, given that the king and queen have "changed clothes" as it were. Indeed, the name is the only point of the opening. It was an invention of Jack Young – at least the idea was; he actually started with 1 e3 iirc – who made up all sort of daft openings just for the hell of it. There's no chess logic to any of them, but he won games anyway because he was a lot stronger than his opponents. Would Carlsen beat most people here with this opening? Yes, he probably would, and for the same reason.