It depends how much you've played. As a benchmark, Carlsen's FIDE rating was 2100+ at 11 years old. If you had a FIDE rating of 1800 then you'd be in the top 25% of FIDE rated 11 year olds. Online ratings are difficult to have confidence in. In your case, we can see that you've lost your last 2 matches to 500 rated players. Which would be almost impossible for a 1800 rated player.
Yeah no, I don't play on this account. My friends do. This is my alt account.
I am 1375 bullet at 13 years old, is that good?
As far as I can see you only played 1 game of bullet in which opponent has their account closed for fair play.
I am 1375 bullet at 13 years old, is that good?
Not nearly as good as the 2750 FIDE rating you claim.
Everything is good when you are a 11 or 13 years old.
i'm 4 years old is that good?
No, most in the orient skip that age.
My lichess elo is 1800 and I just wanted to know if that's good or not.
Not if you're 11. At exactly 9.25, that might have been ok.
This hurts me cause I'm 5-6 years older and 850 elo rapid
This hurts me cause I'm 5-6 years older and 850 elo rapid
Well lichess vs rapid is different. Whatever that means.
I stubbed my left toe. What should my rating be?
2900
I am 9 and my lichess rapid rating is 2654
also my chess.com blitz is 1555
lastly my chess.com rapid is 1453
my uscf rating is 1142... something like that
is that good?
My stubbed toe isn't impressed
Imo lichess rating is inflated a lot. I remember someone here was 1500 and 2000 ish in lichess
Nevertheless I think that rating is good
How do lichess ratings compare to chess.com ratings, like whats the average difference
My lichess elo is 1800 and I just wanted to know if that's good or not.