What is a good rating for a teenager?



I'd think 3500 is good, phenomenal even.
But here is the real answer: It has nothing to do with "teenager" or "kid" or what ever. It depends on how long you've been playing and how many games/hour you have on the clock. If you just started playing chess last week, then you're fantastic at 700. But if you've been playing 10 years, then 700 is not shameful, but it's definitely at the lower end of things (if you truly continuously played chess regularly for 10 years)
"3500" you're delusional

I'd think 3500 is good, phenomenal even.
But here is the real answer: It has nothing to do with "teenager" or "kid" or what ever. It depends on how long you've been playing and how many games/hour you have on the clock. If you just started playing chess last week, then you're fantastic at 700. But if you've been playing 10 years, then 700 is not shameful, but it's definitely at the lower end of things (if you truly continuously played chess regularly for 10 years)
3500 is not possible rating, its even impossible for the World's top players, EX: Magnus Carlsen and Hikaru Nakamura to reach 3500 in blitz or bullet chess.
OTB ratings, Magnus Carlsen's peak was 2882.
I guess you were referring to a chess.com puzzle rating?
I'm sure they would say that if they were refering to that.
hikaru once reached 3500+ in bullet i think
Hikaru did, but it doesn't mean that everyone else than him is not fit to be called good at chess.
The guy who said 3500 is the line for anyone to be called good at chess shouldn't be talking, he plays below the 1000 level, just a troller.
lol...