Hey, your record has more losses, 17,821 (7,297 W/ 10,144 L / 380 D), how about you just stop?
Hehe..You are a new member with new account. Joined on Mar 25, 2014. Just play 3 bullet so your points is fake! Play me if u wanna know how strong you are!
Fake? i don't brag about a virtual rating like you do, so what if i'm new? you're acting like an excited kid with nothing better to do, but you're a troll.
Hahaha...scared? lol
Why would i be scared of an idiot? meet me at live chess and let's play.
Hey, challenge me, i'm waiting, hurry up and get ready to lose.
Ok, It's looking for mate only. Won on Time is illegal (disqualification) do you agree?
[snip]
Thanks. Exactly the answer I wanted
Of course it is...it is the answer that massaged your ego and told you what you wanted to hear...that you are actually okay at chess. That was nice of him. I would have told you otherwise.
Think you are streets ahead in quantity.
That's my right. Why do you object?? I suggest you stop following (tracking off) all of my threads. It's simple ! Thanks,-
In fact it's NOT your right to spam other people's threads with your games and diagrams. It's called spamming.
On a personal note.. Now if they were decent games I would mind less.
Ok, It's looking for mate only. Won on Time is illegal (disqualification) do you agree?
Fight you fool!
Ytou idiot, you will probably lose on time intentionally!
Think you are streets ahead in quantity.
That's my right. Why do you object?? I suggest you stop following (tracking off) all of my threads. It's simple ! Thanks,-
In fact it's NOT your right to spam other people's threads with your games and diagrams. It's called spamming.
On a personal note.. Now if they were decent games I would mind less.
Owhh,, I'm sorry I dont know : you are the owner of this thread.
Owhh,, I'm sorry I dont know : you are the owner of this thread.
No, I'm not. Speaking in general. And you are misbehaving.
What the... Flehb's account closed? LOL.
Report for insulting and shaming ! If you feel this was an error, please click here
FM nobodyreally: hi master, tech me about bullet, please. Play unrated...?
FM nobodyreally: hi master, tech me about bullet, please. Play unrated...?
I would give you a match if you knew how to behave. So, the answer is no.
What the... Flehb's account closed? LOL.
Report for insulting and shaming ! If you feel this was an error, please click here
So, am I to understand you reported him to the admins?
A players true rating is the one they get when they play in true tournaments. By that I mean real over the board live tournaments where they give you a rating based on your true results. I hope this helps, good luck.
The_Con_Artist, I agree and disagree. Rating is a bit of science. At least in the sense that the formula is designed so there is a known probability of winning/loosing based on your rating. For example the player who is 200 higher should score 76% of time, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system.
As it is just a probability, it can happen that 2000 player beets 2100 player 10 times in a row. It is very unlikely that 1500 player beets 2500 player 10 times in a row, but still there is a very small chance.
I agree that ratings are overrated, but it is also a good indicator of your personal progress. If your rating goes up, your training plan seems to be good. Bullet and standard ratings are not very comparable, still 2000+ standard chess players tend to be good in blitz and bullet too.
How about these facts?
Link: http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=829629627
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=822819535
More Games :
1. http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=825021898
2. http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=831291337
3. http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=831356797
I don't blame you, in spite of your punk-like literary style. Anyway, I'm afraid that probability can't be based on 5 games. You played thousands of games and it might be interesting to do analysis on the full set. I guess the outcome would be that if we took into account only games with players who had 100 or more games, the probability of winning would be correlated with the elo difference. Some mathematician/programmer as an volunteer to prove/disprove this? And of course technical constraints like lags affects online elo especially for the bullet games, but it's not easy to avoid that.
[snip]
Thanks. Exactly the answer I wanted
Of course it is...it is the answer that massaged your ego and told you what you wanted to hear...that you are actually okay at chess. That was nice of him. I would have told you otherwise.
I don't think that's what I was saying. If anything, my point was "okay at chess" is relative. Compared to seasoned club players and professionals, obviously he is not a "good" chess player. But, a 1200 player will beat a complete beginner. That shows his effort has taken him somewhere.
[snip]
Thanks. Exactly the answer I wanted
Of course it is...it is the answer that massaged your ego and told you what you wanted to hear...that you are actually okay at chess. That was nice of him. I would have told you otherwise.
He never told me I'm okay. Making up things to get your point forward is generally not a good idea, just sayin'
Hey, your record has more losses, 17,821 (7,297 W/ 10,144 L / 380 D), how about you just stop?
Hehe..You are a new member with new account. Joined on Mar 25, 2014. Just play 3 bullet so your points is fake! Play me if u wanna know how strong you are!
Fake? i don't brag about a virtual rating like you do, so what if i'm new? you're acting like an excited kid with nothing better to do, but you're a troll.