What is Consider a Good Chess Rating on this Site?
Sort:
Jun 9, 2021
0
#482
I’m a damn good chess player. I beat my mom every time. And she even knows how the horsey moves. But I still have to explain to her how to castle. That’s besides the point. She’s smart as hell...If I can beat her then I can beat magnus
I hope you're not serious...
Jun 9, 2021
0
#484
I would consider 3185 a decent Blitz rating, 3382 a decent Bullet rating, 2614 a decent Daily rating, 24436 a decent Daily960 rating, 65402 a decent Puzzles rating, 3069 a decent Live960 rating, 3050 a decent Bughouse rating, 2872 a decent 3 Check rating, 2963 a decent CrazyHouse rating, and last but not least, 3025 a decent King of the Hill rating.
Jun 9, 2021
0
#485
juan3758 wrote:
also cm do not need to go to OTB tournaments
Like the other titles, CM can only be earned OTB.
Only the Arena titles can be earned online... and they are generally regarded as worthless.
Jul 12, 2021
0
#486
Whoa you guys I have a rapid rating of 651 right now and I consider it good and y'all think 1200 is beginner level how do you guys even you know how are you even so good?
1100
Tall = taller than me
Short = shorter than me
Jul 12, 2021
0
#491
2Ke21-0 wrote:
I would consider 3185 a decent Blitz rating, 3382 a decent Bullet rating, 2614 a decent Daily rating, 24436 a decent Daily960 rating, 65402 a decent Puzzles rating, 3069 a decent Live960 rating, 3050 a decent Bughouse rating, 2872 a decent 3 Check rating, 2963 a decent CrazyHouse rating, and last but not least, 3025 a decent King of the Hill rating.
I consider you getting a life lol 
Jul 12, 2021
0
#492
DigitalWarfare wrote:
I_make_mistakes_16 wrote:
Whoa you guys I have a rapid rating of 651 right now and I consider it good and y'all think 1200 is beginner level how do you guys even you know how are you even so good?
Dude, even I'm still terrible. Do you have any idea how many mistakes 1500's make? 651 is atrocious. It means you're chess retarded.
I am 13 bruh I have the highest rating in my class
Jul 12, 2021
0
#493
DigitalWarfare wrote:
I_make_mistakes_16 wrote:
DigitalWarfare wrote:
I_make_mistakes_16 wrote:
Whoa you guys I have a rapid rating of 651 right now and I consider it good and y'all think 1200 is beginner level how do you guys even you know how are you even so good?
Dude, even I'm still terrible. Do you have any idea how many mistakes 1500's make? 651 is atrocious. It means you're chess retarded.
I am 13 bruh I have the highest rating in my class
Pretty stupid class then.
What do u expect fro more 8th grade?
Jul 12, 2021
0
#494
I mean that all of those kids are more interested in video games than real games only3-4 know how to play
Jul 12, 2021
0
#495
DigitalWarfare wrote:
I_make_mistakes_16 wrote:
DigitalWarfare wrote:
I_make_mistakes_16 wrote:
DigitalWarfare wrote:
I_make_mistakes_16 wrote:
Whoa you guys I have a rapid rating of 651 right now and I consider it good and y'all think 1200 is beginner level how do you guys even you know how are you even so good?
Dude, even I'm still terrible. Do you have any idea how many mistakes 1500's make? 651 is atrocious. It means you're chess retarded.
I am 13 bruh I have the highest rating in my class
Pretty stupid class then.
What do u expect from 8th grade in India?
Not very much.
Ok that's just downright discrimination
Jul 12, 2021
0
#496
DigitalWarfare wrote:
I_make_mistakes_16 wrote:
DigitalWarfare wrote:
I_make_mistakes_16 wrote:
DigitalWarfare wrote:
I_make_mistakes_16 wrote:
DigitalWarfare wrote:
I_make_mistakes_16 wrote:
Whoa you guys I have a rapid rating of 651 right now and I consider it good and y'all think 1200 is beginner level how do you guys even you know how are you even so good?
Dude, even I'm still terrible. Do you have any idea how many mistakes 1500's make? 651 is atrocious. It means you're chess retarded.
I am 13 bruh I have the highest rating in my class
Pretty stupid class then.
What do u expect from 8th grade in India?
Not very much.
Ok that's just downright discrimination
No...no, it's not. You don't know what you're talking about.
ok i really dont want to get in an argument with a grown up so whatever
JuliusH wrote:
You can view a distribution on ratings on here (https://www.chess.com/echess/players.html). It follows pretty typical Gaussian (aka "Bell) distribution, so if "good" is considered being in the top quarter, or tenth, or whatever you can go and find it yourself. It seems average on here is centered at 1310.
Му browser said... the page you are looking for... doesn't exist. )
Loomis wrote:
"Good" is relative. When I was a sophomore in college I thought I was good because I was one of the two best at the club. The next year a freshman came who was 600 points higher rated than me. Then I was not good at all.
In the United States if you ask someone if they play chess and they say "no," it's because they don't know how the horsey moves. In Russia, if you ask someone if they play chess and they say "no," it's because they're only 1600.
When I was 1200 (USCF) I thought 1400 was good -- those guys could really beat me! Now I don't think 1400 is all that good, but I sure think 2000 is good. Hopefully that will change someday too.
It is one more myth about Russia.
In our village for sure... you find only one Chess board... in my house.
And it is so because my grandfather and dad played Chess with each other.
And they played Chess in our family but they could not go to play Chess in the club even
There were no Chess club for ordinary adult people in USSR.
They were only for kids... So called "the Pioneers Houses".
Jul 12, 2021
0
#499
TheRealThreat wrote:
What is consider a good rating on the site. Well, I think if you are rated above 1800 then you are a good chess player. If you are rated 1500-1799 then you are average. What do you think?
Based on hard statistics, anything over 900 is above 50% percentile I believe. So maybe above 1,000 elo objectively. I guess it just means what you consider "good". "good" to Carelson is vastly different than what is good to a low GM, which is vastly different than a low IM, and so on.
DigitalWarfare wrote:
You guys are crazy. Look at my stats. I'm still a terrible patzer. Don't you understand how bad people like us are compared to 2000+ OTB players? Don't you understand how bad 2000+ OTB players are to 2200+ OTB players? And so on...
1,000 is atrocious - at any time control.
My opinion... Good Chess player is a man with rating of about 2000... not less. )
Look, almost all streamers here have... more or less... thе rating of that range.
To be honest, in real life chess, I'm 1479. But online chess my rating is much lower at around 500ish. I'm not very good online. It is easier for me in real life.