What is the mittens bots real elo?

It's not a smart move to create these cat bots, aimed at children, then publish a story asking "can you beat them all?", then make the top bot play like a full engine.  Because the result is what you see on this thread.  Kids wanting to beat the last bot learning to pull out an engine on their end to get the job done.

I mean, it's like training players to start thinking of cheating as an alternative to be considered.  Whoever came up with this can't see 10 feet in front of their face.

More than 1400 at least because its the last bot in the category.

highest komodo, 2419?

100

Speak for yourself, oldhead

Look, here's one of them now.

I saw a video of it losing to Stockfish 14. So, Mittens is probably like a Stockfishs 13. But, the more players that play it, the stronger the bot gets -- which is absolutely terrifying. Anyway, look at this game I played with Mittens. I'm only 682 rating so, I barely got anywhere.

Mate in 20

I think this mittens has a real elo similar to the maximum engine

Stockfish 9 already beats Mittens

I have put it against stockfish 14+NNUE server version and stockfish wins. So, i would say it's rating is approximately 3400-3600.But still this bot is no joke. Here is the PGN(stockfish is white in this game).     

[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "1-0"]

1. e4 {Meow. I am become Mittens, the destroyer of kings. Hehehe.} 1... e6 {Your
pain will last forever. Hehehehe. Meow.} 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 {*ominously* All chess
players eventually crumble under my mighty paws…I mean, meow $1 Hehehe.} 3... exd5
4. Nf3 Bd6 5. c4 c6 6. Bd3 Qe7+ {Meow. That looks like a check. Hehehehe.} 7.
Be3 dxc4 8. Bxc4 Nf6 9. O-O O-O 10. Re1 Qc7 11. Nc3 Bf5 12. h3 Nbd7 13. Rc1 Rae8
14. d5 Ne5 15. Nxe5 Rxe5 16. Bb3 a6 17. dxc6 bxc6 18. Qe2 Bc5 19. Qf3 Rfe8 20.
Nd5 Nxd5 21. Rxc5 Qb8 22. Bxd5 cxd5 23. Re2 Qd6 24. b4 Qe6 25. Rd2 Be4 26. Qg3
Bg6 27. Rd4 h6 28. a4 Qe7 29. Bd2 Qf6 30. Bc3 Qe6 31. Qg4 Bf5 32. Qg3 Bg6 33.
Rg4 Re2 34. b5 axb5 35. axb5 Kh7 36. Rc6 Qd7 37. Rgxg6 fxg6 38. Rc7 R2e7 39.
Rxd7 {The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long, hehehe. You are
not long for this game.} 39... Rxd7 40. Bd4 Re1+ {Meow. That looks like a check.
Hehehehe.} 41. Kh2 {You have triumphed in existing for longer than many before
you. Hehehe. Meow.} 41... Rb1 42. b6 Rb4 43. Qd3 Rb7 44. Qa6 Rf7 45. Bc5 Rb2 46.
Qa8 Rd7 47. Qc6 Rd8 48. Bd4 Rb4 49. Bxg7 Rxb6 50. Qxb6 Kxg7 51. Qxd8 Kf7 52.
Qxd5+ {I am a tiger and you are in the jungle I call eternity. Hehehe.} 52...
Kf6 53. Qd6+ Kf7 54. Kg3 g5 55. Kg4 Kg7 56. Kf5 Kf7 57. Qd7+ {I am a tiger and
you are in the jungle I call eternity. Hehehe.} 57... Kg8 58. Kf6 Kh8 59. Qg7#
{WHAT $4 $4 HOW $3 $3 $4 $2 YOU CHEA-I mean…meow $1
Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe-} 1-0

3200

I pit the chess.com analysis board stockfish against mittens, and it defeated mittens quite soundly. I'll put pgn below.

[Event "vs Computer"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2023.01.04"]
[Round "-"]
[White "MittensBot"]
[Black "StukaDiveBomber"]
[Result "0-1"]
[CurrentPosition "8/6p1/5pPp/2p2P1P/8/2k5/1q6/K7 w - - 18 56"]
[Timezone "UTC"]
[ECO "D02"]
[ECOUrl "https://www.chess.com/openings/Queens-Pawn-Opening-Zukertort-Variation"]
[UTCDate "2023.01.04"]
[UTCTime "02:54:42"]
[WhiteElo "1"]
[BlackElo "1913"]
[TimeControl "1/0"]
[Termination "StukaDiveBomber won by checkmate"]
[StartTime "02:54:42"]
[EndDate "2023.01.04"]
[EndTime "04:39:47"]
[Link "https://www.chess.com/game/computer/29759257"]

1. Nf3 d5 2. d4 Bf5 3. c4 e6 4. Nc3 c6 5. e3 Nd7 6. Bd3 Bxd3 7. Qxd3 Ngf6 8. e4
Nxe4 9. Nxe4 dxe4 10. Qxe4 Bb4+ 11. Bd2 Bxd2+ 12. Nxd2 Qb6 13. O-O Qxb2 14. Qe3
O-O 15. Rab1 Qxa2 16. Rxb7 $1 Rfd8 17. Qf4 $2 a5 $1 18. Re1 a4 19. Ne4 Qc2 $1 20. Nc5 $2
e5 $1 21. Qf3 Qd2 $1 22. Rd1 $2 Qxd1+ $3 23. Qxd1 Nxc5 24. Rb2 a3 25. Ra2 exd4 26. f3
d3 27. Kf2 d2 28. Ke2 Rd3 29. Kf2 Nb3 30. f4 Nc5 31. Ke2 Rad8 32. Rc2 Ne4 33.
h4 $6 Nc3+ 34. Rxc3 Rxc3 35. f5 Rc1 36. Qxd2 Rxd2+ 37. Kxd2 Rxc4 38. Kd3 a2 39.
Kxc4 a1=Q 40. g4 Qa5 41. Kb3 $6 c5 42. g5 Qb4+ 43. Kc2 Kf8 44. h5 Ke7 45. g6 $6 h6
46. Kd1 f6 47. Kc2 Qc4+ 48. Kb2 Qd3 49. Ka2 Qc3 50. Kb1 Qd2 51. Ka1 Kd6 52. Kb1
Kd5 53. Ka1 Kd4 54. Kb1 Kc3 55. Ka1 Qb2# 0-1

I suspect mittens might be like an older version of stockfish, or it might be leela or something

its accuracy is quite high as a bot (98%), playing almost all the best moves

Edited: Accuracy is not an absolute measure of playing strength (Thanks to bigbadsquid for the info)

play 1min and ez clap

I said it many time and will say it again: accuracy doesn't mean much here and there are no 'best' moves (in most positions).

Accuracy = coincidence with a particular engine version and depth used for analysis, not some absolute measure of playing strength. If the analysis engine is worse than the player of the game being analyzed, then it's like when a weaker player analyzes a game by a stronger player and judges the quality of the stronger player by how much he agrees with their moves.

 'Accuracy' also tends to be very high if the difference in strength is high. I had games with 100% accuracy when my opponent blundered right out of the book. So please, please stop talking about accuracy as if it was some absolute measure of playing strength. 

I doubt it's leela. I let it play against leela several times and leela crushed it in a very positional style (I posted two of the games here). What's more interesting, on several occasions leela chose moves that weren't even considered as top choices by mittens. Of course, this is no proof. 

tbh it might be a bot some random creator created.