equeen7 wrote:
dev_the_pro wrote:
bruh this bot lost to me why would it be rated 1700 or higher
May I have the link to the game? Many GMs and even ~3200 engines have lost to this bot.
That's almost exactly what I said.
What is the mittens' real rating?
Sort:
Jan 3, 2023
0
#83
borui_chen wrote:
after reading all of these messages i think it adapts to how well its opponent is for example i am 1219 rated against bots and it is definetly not 3200+ she wouldve beaten me like 3 moves into the game if she is actually 3200 rated; and some other people said mittens is rated at like 1200 rated when they are playing against her and the people who is playing against her is also 1200+ rated so thats why i think it adapts to her opponents elo
But then it beat the chess.com 3200 engine level
skill issue
just bad
no mittens is 1 elo
you guys are just lower than one elo
I guess the developers had made it about 3400 because it can be defeated by stockfish 14.
adamling09 wrote:
GlutesChess skrev:
I'm finding it really hard to believe that a 900 rating player beat a 3200 engine with help on only 2 move, especially given that your opening was picture perfect and your most recent player game as black you lose the queen playing a terrible opening.
I dont have a chess.com account. This is my younger brothers account. My elo is 2100 while my brothers is about 900 = this account. He told me that a bot had an elo of 1 but at the same time had a much higher elo. So I didn't know what I was up to. I needed 2 moves as help in the middle-game but that was it. I didn't think I would win but here I am.
yeah, you didn't think all of your moves would be first two lines of Stockfish, yet here you are. cmon man 
you admit to cheating for 2 moves, but not all the others, esp. when statistically there's a 99.9% chance that's exactly what happened that game?
Jan 4, 2023
0
#92
FemboyVladi wrote:
It has beaten Stockfish with 2800 Elo, so she defenitly is a GM
I dont think a GM could beat stockfish lol
Jan 4, 2023
0
#93
w3lld4n3 wrote:
I tried to beat him with training mod on (one crown gives after play) and we ended up with a draw. His accuracy was 98,8 and mine was 98,6. This bot's elo is definitely 3700 or even more
thats too high, maybe around 3000-3200
Jan 4, 2023
0
#94
adamling09 wrote:
bojevillya skrev:
adamling09 wrote:
GlutesChess skrev:
I'm finding it really hard to believe that a 900 rating player beat a 3200 engine with help on only 2 move, especially given that your opening was picture perfect and your most recent player game as black you lose the queen playing a terrible opening.
I dont have a chess.com account. This is my younger brothers account. My elo is 2100 while my brothers is about 900 = this account. He told me that a bot had an elo of 1 but at the same time had a much higher elo. So I didn't know what I was up to. I needed 2 moves as help in the middle-game but that was it. I didn't think I would win but here I am.
yeah, you didn't think all of your moves would be first two lines of Stockfish, yet here you are. cmon man you admit to cheating for 2 moves, but not all the others, esp. when statistically there's a 99.9% chance that's exactly what happened that game?
I didn't know that I was that good! Thanks for telling me about that!
You can think whatever you want but I played, not stockfish. I dont even have that downloaded lmao. Im 2100 and won. Stop being rediculous.
right, and I'm the queen of england
I beat them
Jan 4, 2023
0
#96
wow!!! a 500 rated playing at 96 accuracy against a 3000+ level bot! awesome job and very much legit
its 1 it says it right there
Jan 4, 2023
0
#100
or maybe because she actually deserves 1 elo since she just sucks so bad she resigns when she is winning LMAO
https://www.chess.com/game/computer/29766485
Guys, he played it on 1|0 and his position was lost when mittens ran out of time.
I beat it at 1|0 too, it's very easy because chess.com doesn't make it play faster.
that is true