What is the most moved piece in chess?

Sort:
Game_of_Pawns
TheLastBlueFriend wrote:

you guys forget that pawns aren't pieces.

Since when?

Game_of_Pawns
royalknight101 wrote:

they arent really considered pieces

So they are pieces, and were also specifically mentioned in the OP tongue.png

SparkyChessTiger2021

Pawns are the soul of chess!

Born2slaYer
Game_of_Pawns wrote:
royalknight101 wrote:

they arent really considered pieces

So they are pieces, and were also specifically mentioned in the OP

I think pawns are not considered as pieces

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_piece

 

Game_of_Pawns
royalknight101 wrote:

they arent and are worthless 

Oh naturally!

Born2slaYer

Sigh I am also confused 

SparkyChessTiger2021

Capablanca said that pawns are the soul of chess

Born2slaYer
SparkyChessTiger2021 wrote:

Capablanca said that pawns are the soul of chess

Lol but where did he said they are pieces.

Game_of_Pawns
CongoratsUlost2me wrote:

Sigh I am also confused 

How so? lol

Born2slaYer

1) It may mean any of the physical pieces of the set, including the pawns. When used this way, "piece" is synonymous with "chessman" (Hooper & Whyld 1992:307) or simply "man" (Hooper & Whyld 1987:200). 2) In play, the term is usually used to exclude pawns, referring only to a queen, rook, bishop, knight, or king

Born2slaYer

I founded this but I am not sure this is correct or not

Game_of_Pawns

It looks like you're confusing yourself. I'd assumed your comment saying they weren't pieces was sarcastic, especially as it linked to an article stating that they were in fact pieces^...

Game_of_Pawns

How's this for a clue: Is anybody here saying that Queens or Rooks aren't pieces?

Born2slaYer
Game_of_Pawns wrote:

It looks like you're confusing yourself. I'd assumed your comment saying they weren't pieces was sarcastic, especially as it linked to an article stating that they were in fact pieces^...

Dude I am not confusing myself just try searching pawns are not pieces on the Internet at the same time when I check it on wiki it says that pawns are pieces.

Game_of_Pawns
CongoratsUlost2me wrote:

Dude I am not confusing myself just try searching pawns are not pieces on the Internet at the same time when I check it on wiki it says that pawns are pieces.

You posted a link to an article stating that pawns are pieces, whilst posting that it stated the opposite.

 

That article also gives an example of a specific context where "saying" piece would actually mean only Knight or Bishop. Yet nobody here is saying that Queens or Rooks aren't pieces...

 

The only other people in this thread saying that pawns aren't pieces are somebody trolling/being sarcastic (made very obvious by the pawns are worthless comments) and somebody low rated.

 

You sound confused to me but if you're not, you're not. That's fine.

Born2slaYer
Game_of_Pawns wrote:
CongoratsUlost2me wrote:

Dude I am not confusing myself just try searching pawns are not pieces on the Internet at the same time when I check it on wiki it says that pawns are pieces.

You posted a link to an article stating that pawns are pieces, whilst posting that it stated the opposite.

 

That article also gives an example of a specific context where "saying" piece would actually mean only Knight or Bishop. Yet nobody here is saying that Queens or Rooks aren't pieces...

 

The only other people in this thread saying that pawns aren't pieces are somebody trolling/being sarcastic (made very obvious by the pawns are worthless comments) and somebody low rated.

 

You sound confused to me but if you're not, you're not. That's fine.

Well your username is dedicated to pawn so you may be knowing more than me about pawns 

Born2slaYer

In my personal opinion pawns are not considered as pieces.

TheBlueFriend
CongoratsUlost2me wrote:

In my personal opinion pawns are not considered as pieces.

same

 

SparkyChessTiger2021
CongoratsUlost2me wrote:
Game_of_Pawns wrote:
CongoratsUlost2me wrote:

Dude I am not confusing myself just try searching pawns are not pieces on the Internet at the same time when I check it on wiki it says that pawns are pieces.

You posted a link to an article stating that pawns are pieces, whilst posting that it stated the opposite.

 

That article also gives an example of a specific context where "saying" piece would actually mean only Knight or Bishop. Yet nobody here is saying that Queens or Rooks aren't pieces...

 

The only other people in this thread saying that pawns aren't pieces are somebody trolling/being sarcastic (made very obvious by the pawns are worthless comments) and somebody low rated.

 

You sound confused to me but if you're not, you're not. That's fine.

Well your username is dedicated to pawn so you may be knowing more than me about pawns 

yeah, I agree

TheBlueFriend

i was the first to say pawns aren't pieces and would you look at this argument

LOL