no leagues was a failed attempt by chess.com to rack in more money leagues have nothing to do with ability thats rating points
Then the current league system should be abolished. It doesn't make sense for players to compete against opponents from different leagues, as this undermines the purpose of having separate leagues. Players should only compete against others in their own league. Pairing players with more advanced competitors contradicts the principles of fair play, in my opinion. At the very least, we should have the choice to either play within our own league or venture out to play against people strictly based on our rating.
I'm hoping someone can help me understand the purpose of leagues. I'm currently in the Stone league, yet I'm being matched against players who are Legends, Champions, and Elite. How does that make sense?
Isn't the main purpose of having leagues to ensure that players compete against others in the same league? Why are players from lower leagues matched against those in much higher ones?
Are leagues merely for bragging rights? If not, then wouldn't it make more sense to pair players against others in the same league rather than those in significantly higher leagues?