What is the point of this?

Sort:
NeilBerm
DontMateMeBrah wrote:

What's hard to prove about a bunch of 0 move losses?

If it is that blatant it probably wouldn't be that hard. However, I still don't think chess.com would care as much as they would for engine use since what upsets people the most is when they lose to people they think are cheating. That is what chess.com would make it their priority to eliminate. Every once in awhile I will play a move and then someone plays a move and resigns, but I just assume they had to leave since I also do that when something comes up. I just start a new seek so I can keep playing. They could have been sandbagging but I wouldn't know unless I looked them up and checked their game history.

I was once playing crazyhouse against someone who was higher rated but kept playing ridiculous moves and losing. He told me after a few games he wanted to lower his rating so he could surprise people in an upcoming crazyhouse tournament. I stopped playing him since the games were pointless but I didn't bother to report him and I think people like that would probably never get banned even if they were reported. There is no way to really prove it by looking at the games.

FM_Checkmate

Actually, Neil, there was an account @cjxchess16, his account got closed due to multiple games in which he sandbagged.

 

Also, reporting can work, they will get a warning, I think, but their account might get closed, or muted. Depending on the situation. Sandbagging is quite a serious matter.

FM_Checkmate

 Sandbagging is violating the Fair Play Rules.

IMBacon22
FM_Checkmate wrote:

Actually, Neil, there was an account @cjxchess16, his account got closed due to multiple games in which he sandbagged.

 

Also, reporting can work, they will get a warning, I think, but their account might get closed, or muted. Depending on the situation. Sandbagging is quite a serious matter.

Then again, if youre 2Q, and violate the site TOS about 500 times, you keep opening account after account after account after account....well you get the idea.  I dont understand the site rules.

FM_Checkmate

Who does? Somebody does something that's against the rules, but they're fine. But, you do something innocent, or just something that wasn't written in the TOS, and you get in trouble.

 

I made a thread to stop racing threads, located in off-topic, and yet, it was closed for no reason WHATSOEVER. Answer me mods, WHY????!!!!

IMBacon22
FM_Checkmate wrote:

Who does? Somebody does something that's against the rules, but they're fine. But, you do something innocent, or just something that wasn't written in the TOS, and you get in trouble.

 

I made a thread to stop racing threads, located in off-topic, and yet, it was closed for no reason WHATSOEVER. Answer me mods, WHY????!!!!

You werent being "all inclusive"

FM_Checkmate

How?

IMBacon22
FM_Checkmate wrote:

How?

You called out a certain group of people.  That isnt being "all inclusive"  You probably hurt someosn feelings.  

FM_Checkmate

Called a certain group? Oh, with the people who like racing threads. Oh, I just meant, some topics are plain, stupid...

IMBacon22
FM_Checkmate wrote:

Called a certain group? Oh, with the people who like racing threads. Oh, I just meant, some topics are plain, stupid...

Plaiin stupid?

You just described the forums...

FM_Checkmate

surprise.png

IMBacon22
bishod wrote:

You do know there is a way to report inappropriate players without creating a thread about it?

JustOneUSer
#42...

Hyprocracy much?
IMBacon22
VicountVonJames wrote:
#42...

Hyprocracy much?

I have the perfect meme for that...

IMBacon22
bishod wrote:

You do know there is a way to report inappropriate players without creating a thread about it?

BeepBeepImA747
Anyone who do not share my political views are stupid -IMBacon
IMBacon22
BeepBeepImA747 wrote:
Anyone who do not share my political views are stupid -IMBacon

Now thats very liberal of you!

IMBacon22
bishod wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
BeepBeepImA747 wrote:
Anyone who do not share my political views are stupid -IMBacon

Now thats very liberal of you!

 

Is your username a deliberate attempt to incense the many Muslim users that use this site? Serious question.

I honestly doubt you even know what a serious question is, and your history here backs that up.  But to be fair, yes i will answer your question.

My username is what it is because i like it.  No other reason or motive.  Now run with that and turn it into anything you like.  

DontMateMeBrah

I'm so glad to see that chess.com finally got a handle on the 2Q1C situation... Wow the bishod account is from 2009. That loser been trolling here for a long time!

IMBacon22
DontMateMeBrah wrote:

I'm so glad to see that chess.com finally got a handle on the 2Q1C situation... Wow the bishod account is from 2009. That loser been trolling here for a long time!

I think chess.com made the correct decision with 2Q.  Let him join, let him play, but dont let hm post until he can show that he can act like a mature human.  

The other guy?  No clue who he is, or how long they have been here.  He has just started the troll thing recently.  Why? Who knows...