What is your favorite chess piece?


Let me break it down this way: The king, knight and pawn are the only true and authentic chess pieces.
The rook was the ‘ruch’ or chariot originally until it got changed for political reasons.
A castle tower is not called a rook and castles can’t fight wars. So this piece really is just a joke.
The bishop was originally the elephant. Again, bishops know nothing of war and it is sad that Christian belief needed to be forced on the game. I certainly don’t want to go to war trusting a bishop to achieve anything on the battlefield.
The queen was originally the vezier or kings advisor. Who sends his wife to go fight his battles.
We can conclude that the rook, bishop and queen humiliate the spirit of chess.
I prefer knights. It is the only piece with a face, eyes, mouth making them unique.
It moves in the most unique was and can jump over pieces.
On every level knights are superior.

I would also like to point out that Christianity does not mean Catholicism. Catholicism is a major group in Christianity, but by refering to Christians as the same as Catholics could possibly bother some people.
As for the reason they named a piece the "bishop", I don't really know why. It could've probably been given a better name than that; like archer, or cannon, or simply left at elephant.
I agree on the rook thing. I once googled what a rook is just to see what it was I used in my army. What I found, is that a "rook" is a type of crow-like bird. They should've probably left the name at "Chariot".
The Knight was initially called the "horse". So I'd consider it an upgrade that they changed it to Knight (Since horses don't make very good soldiers).
Pawns were also initially called soldiers.
The King was also called the Shah in the past. But shah and king are very similar definitions so it didn't really change much.

You are clearly highly intelligent and a person with excellent taste hajixib.
Knights are indeed the best.

LM player I simply feel Christianity whether Catholics, protestant or any other of the many variations should just not have been included and I would feel the same if the bishop was turned into a Buddha.
No religion should have a place in a universal game.
I do get you on the fact that Catholicism does not represent all of Christianity, it was not my intention to suggest that.


This entire thread is clearly filled with well read, sensible and thinking people.
I believe this is why we all vote for the knight as the best piece, great minds think alike.


It isn't really an universal game, this particular member of certain family of board games was developed in Europe and later was spreaded globally for political reasons.

Let me break it down this way: The king, knight and pawn are the only true and authentic chess pieces.
The rook was the ‘ruch’ or chariot originally until it got changed for political reasons.
A castle tower is not called a rook and castles can’t fight wars. So this piece really is just a joke.
The bishop was originally the elephant. Again, bishops know nothing of war and it is sad that Christian belief needed to be forced on the game. I certainly don’t want to go to war trusting a bishop to achieve anything on the battlefield.
The queen was originally the vezier or kings advisor. Who sends his wife to go fight his battles.
We can conclude that the rook, bishop and queen humiliate the spirit of chess.
I prefer knights. It is the only piece with a face, eyes, mouth making them unique.
It moves in the most unique was and can jump over pieces.
On every level knights are superior.

The queen was initially the advisor, but there was a brief period where some people called the advisor the queen despite the fact that it was still pretty weak for a piece. The Queen became a piece after an ancient chess variant called "Mad Queen Chess" became popular amongst players.

This entire thread is clearly filled with well read, sensible and thinking people.
I believe this is why we all vote for the knight as the best piece, great minds think alike.