I play according to my opponent. I think I am positional.
what type of player are you
Sort:
landwehr wrote:
reckless and unstable
Is that you?
Did somebody chain you to the computer? If you are being held hostage just type HHHH ok?
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!
lol!
theoreticalboy wrote:
Bad.
lol
I'd say I am an attacker.
my style could be considered blind,antipositional, crazy and unfathomable hope chess.
I just try to find the best move.
HHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!
I try not the rush but it so hard!!!
I like to try to tie the game up in a big tactical knot that's so complicated that neither of us can understand it, then hope their brain explodes before mine does. Doesn't always work, but I like to try anyway ... ;-) Other than that, I'm a big fan of tying up and trapping my opponent's pieces :-) .
I would say that right now I am what I would call an "experimenter". I am still relatively inexperienced with low ratings. I experiment with ideas that I read in books, watch on youtube, etc. and see what happens. As I do this I figure out what works and what doesn't. While I do many different ideas, I'm more of an attacker and tactician. As I develop my skill this is what I expect my style will be.
[COMMENT DELETED]
rmurray wrote:
Flute. ?
ya i totally understand ure specifec type of disorder
rmurray wrote:
popopop1234567890 wrote:
i am the most hated player on chess.com cause i am a big fat sour loser i always resigen bec i hate ppl i am a robot i come from ure moms pu$$y cause she cheats on ure dad
I was just thinking to myself how these forums remind me of "The Jerry Springer Show", and wouldn' you know it, bam.....get a load of this.....the lowest common denominator....way to go chess.com
i dont rlly understand ure insult please think of an insult that evryone will understand not just geeks like u lmaoooooo
rmurray wrote:
jmandell wrote:
I would say that right now I am what I would call an "experimenter". I am still relatively inexperienced with low ratings. I experiment with ideas that I read in books, watch on youtube, etc. and see what happens. As I do this I figure out what works and what doesn't. While I do many different ideas, I'm more of an attacker and tactician. As I develop my skill this is what I expect my style will be.
Dude.... you are an "experimenter", and a .....loser. Why not try standard chess, and think about what your doing. Isn't "experimenter", experimentor?
First off, I have been playing seriously for about 2 or 3 weeks, so don't expect me to win every game. As I said in my original post I try different openings, endgame strategies, ect. to find out what works and what doesn't - that is how I learn. That is the way new things come about and people learn new things, so please explain to me what is wrong with experimenting.
I'll leave you with this:
"If I find 10,000 ways something won't work, I haven't failed. I am not discouraged, because every wrong attempt discarded is another step forward". - Thomas Edison
rmurray wrote:
jmandell wrote:
rmurray wrote:
jmandell wrote:
I would say that right now I am what I would call an "experimenter". I am still relatively inexperienced with low ratings. I experiment with ideas that I read in books, watch on youtube, etc. and see what happens. As I do this I figure out what works and what doesn't. While I do many different ideas, I'm more of an attacker and tactician. As I develop my skill this is what I expect my style will be.
Dude.... you are an "experimenter", and a .....loser. Why not try standard chess, and think about what your doing. Isn't "experimenter", experimentor?
First off, I have been playing seriously for about 2 or 3 weeks, so don't expect me to win every game. As I said in my original post I try different openings, endgame strategies, ect. to find out what works and what doesn't - that is how I learn. That is the way new things come about and people learn new things, so please explain to me what is wrong with experimenting.
I'll leave you with this:
"If I find 10,000 ways something won't work, I haven't failed. I am not discouraged, because every wrong attempt discarded is another step forward". - Thomas Edison
Yeah.....like i said..."take another step forward", and play standard chess and think about what youre doing. You will learn more.
"It is advisable to ....Think ...before doing....Anything" Sidhartha
What is "standard chess"? I didn't know that everyone has to play the exact same way.
[ What is "standard chess"? I didn't know that everyone has to play the exact same way. ]
We all have to try to mate the opponents King to win.
I'm kind of ADHD and impulsive, so I tend to play fast. My brain makes connections fast and patience and thinking the decisions through is one of the things that I'm working on. I am playing some day long turn games, but I try to play a lot of live chess to better suit my high speed brain.
rmurray wrote:
jmandell wrote:
I'm kind of ADHD and impulsive, so I tend to play fast. My brain makes connections fast and patience and thinking the decisions through is one of the things that I'm working on. I am playing some day long turn games, but I try to play a lot of live chess to better suit my high speed brain.
That is lovely, Mr. HighSpeed, but don't plan on winning a whole lot.
challenge me to an online game, and we will see.
reckless and unstable