What's your chess goal? 🎉

Sort:
Chuck639

I think within this year, I lost count on recycled accounts and cheaters.

Chuck639
CooloutAC wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:

I think within this year, I lost count on recycled accounts and cheaters.

 

In 30 years of online gaming I've never seen it openly accepted in any community except for this one.  Literally.  Even the site themselves sanction "speedrunners"   It blows my mind.     Add that to the amount of people who burn themselves out trying to reach some "goal" they set for themselves.  

Its funny but last month i was trying out playing on some other websites and apps.   Installed a copule on my windows pc and on my amazon fire tablet that have easily findable matches.  and wow,  I literally destroy people on them,  have winning records,  ratings around 1500.    Yet on here i can barely get 600 and lose most of my games.  haha.  

Even on lichess,  I'm 1400 on rapid and classical,  700 and dropping here.     But its really not just about the ratings which are really meaningless and depend on playerbase and rating system.  Its the competitiveness of the matches.   Chess.com is probably the hardest place to play.

I wouldn’t disagree there is a mixed bag on this site.

I have decided to pick and choose my battles now to mitigate the exposure. In the last few months, I’ve must of lost about 50+ points to cheaters.

I still chuckle that a 1200 knows the Grunfeld-Amsterdam variation, never mind know it but execute it deep lol

MiralSelchintet

My old goal was 1500 daily and 2000 puzzles. That accomplished, my new goals are:

A) Never ever blunder my queen, never ever again!

B) Never not see a discovered attack coming my way.

C) Defeat Magnus Carlsen 10 straight times.

D) Never fall prey to  a knight fork.

Three of the four goals can quickly be achieved to 100% perfection by retiring instantly from chess.

My fertile childlike imagination makes the other one possible in my head.

 

InsertInterestingNameHere

“I think it was GM Finegold who said a 700 rated player on this site can probably beat everyone they know in the street.”

 

This is true, but is beating random people on the street at chess really an accurate indicator of skill? Beating people in the street who only know the basic rules =/ good.

InsertInterestingNameHere

I am saying that the quote itself is true, but it is misleading. Yes, your average 700 can beat everyone they know in the street, but that is not an accurate, nor good measure of skill.

Therefore, there is really no point to the quote. It’s true, but it doesn’t help measure your actual skill in any way, except for the fact that you’re better than people who don’t play the game. Big whooop.

InsertInterestingNameHere

I apologize, I’m not really being concise. I’m asking, what was the point of quoting that?

InsertInterestingNameHere

“Why do you feel it is not an accurate measure of skill”

because beating random people that don’t play chess is not hard, and not a good representation of one’s skill.

 

btw, this is the calmest conversation I’ve had with you thus far, well done 👏

InsertInterestingNameHere
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:

“Why do you feel it is not an accurate measure of skill”

because beating random people that don’t play chess is not hard, and not a good representation of one’s skill.

 

btw, this is the calmest conversation I’ve had with you thus far, well done 👏

A better representation of skill is to compare how good you are to other chess players. Which is why an elo of 700 is generally considered not very good

KnightDimension
To at least win one game out five or ten. The only way that happens with me AND I DONT UNDERSTAND is that the more I spend time on this game the worse I perform. For me it was about 50/50 on wins and losses and this whole past year it’s like I went brain dead. I guess I did?
Duck
CooloutAC wrote:
KnightDimension wrote:
To at least win one game out five or ten. The only way that happens with me AND I DONT UNDERSTAND is that the more I spend time on this game the worse I perform. For me it was about 50/50 on wins and losses and this whole past year it’s like I went brain dead. I guess I did?

 

That happens to many of us in the short term.  For example tilting.  When i'm losing,  and I continue to play I will just continue to lose lol.   Its best to stop,  but I can't! until i get at least one win even after 20 losses! hahah.

The best way (for me) to neutralize tilt is right after I lose a game. After losing a game, I take a short 30 second break to cool off or to get some water. It really helps me regain my rating rather than instantly pressing "play" after losing a won endgame. If I lose 2-3 games in a row I'll either take an hour break and hang out with my brothers, go outdoors, or eat something. 

InsertInterestingNameHere
CooloutAC wrote:
KnightDimension wrote:
To at least win one game out five or ten. The only way that happens with me AND I DONT UNDERSTAND is that the more I spend time on this game the worse I perform. For me it was about 50/50 on wins and losses and this whole past year it’s like I went brain dead. I guess I did?

 

That happens to many of us in the short term.  For example tilting.  When i'm losing,  and I continue to play I will just continue to lose lol.   Its best to stop,  but I can't! until i get at least one win even after 20 losses! hahah.

-2:01am

-Sunday

-Renovations to be done on a house tomorrow (today, technically)

-50 elo down the gutter

 

i must ask myself, how did I get here?

Wits-end

My goal is simple: I hope to be alive to be able to play a game on 12/31/2022. 

Melitti

 

Chess is like life. There are ups and downs. But the main thing is to have fun with each passing day so that you don't have to regret anything afterwards.

https://www.chess.com/blog/Melitti/the-malinoiss-gambit 

Love and chess 

                        wink

 

Suzki

My goal is to get to 2000+ rating at some point and start playing in OTB tournaments (I have my first one in autumn)