When "Chomping On Hanging Pieces" is a TERRIBLE Idea...

Sort:
Avatar of DoYouLikeCurry
chesssblackbelt wrote:

But this thread has everything

It has drama, action, romance

True true 😭

Avatar of Broskihangingpiecequacker

It has the little *quack*

Avatar of badger_song

This thread is a PBS Edwardian Drama, it's worth the investment.

Avatar of Broskihangingpiecequacker

If chomping on hanging pieces is a bad idea, it's either a sac or not hanging. It's simple. If chomping isn't a good idea, then the piece isn't hanging.

Avatar of DoYouLikeCurry
Broskihangingpiecequacker wrote:

If chomping on hanging pieces is a bad idea, it's either a sac or not hanging. It's simple. If chomping isn't a good idea, then the piece isn't hanging.

“When we first learn the game we are terrible materialists. We capture as many enemy pieces as we can without paying much attention to other factors. A game between two beginners can look more like Pac-Man than chess as they gobble up the pieces. […] It doesn’t take long in chess or elsewhere to realise that there is much more to life than material.”

- Garry Kasparov, ”How Life Imitates Chess”(Penguin, 2021), pg. 81

Avatar of AlexDaGood
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:
Broskihangingpiecequacker wrote:

If chomping on hanging pieces is a bad idea, it's either a sac or not hanging. It's simple. If chomping isn't a good idea, then the piece isn't hanging.

“When we first learn the game we are terrible materialists. We capture as many enemy pieces as we can without paying much attention to other factors. A game between two beginners can look more like Pac-Man than chess as they gobble up the pieces. […] It doesn’t take long in chess or elsewhere to realise that there is much more to life than material.”

- Garry Kasparov, ”How Life Imitates Chess”(Penguin, 2021), pg. 81

Just like children, they like to eat things. Later in life, they realize that life has more meaning than being a human Pac-Man