who is better magnus or gukesh


I believe that they are all very unique in their own ways. But in the game of chess, I think versatility is more admirable. In that aspect, I would say that Magnus is the most versatile of all of MASTERS. Respectfully, I say this because if you were to ask the MASTERS. I believe that everyone would say that he is the man to beat. Let's be honest, I believe he has set a new standard with versatility in his game. I bow down to all chess players. It is probably the only competition that everyone wants to win, but you have to lose first. So, from the person who just began to play a couple of minutes ago to the person who has played all of their lives. Welcome the community of chess.

Thank you for posting a comment but gukesh has also beaten magnus and magnus has beaten gukesh so I can say both are equal

It's a bit hard to say for current, but most surely Magnus is better, according to list of previous tournaments and results.

If we look further in past, it became clear, that at this moment, Magnus have much more achievements. He was 18x world champion (if we include all titles), was (and still) number 1 in classic for over, than a decade. Holds the world record for highest Elo in Classic, Blitz and Rapid (third one I'm not sure, you can correct me, but first 2 is 100% true), have highest performances ever recorded, had a series of 100+ classical games without a single lose. Have highest average accuracy among all (by chesscom analysis of his classical games). Was WC in all formats Classic, Blitz, and Rapid. Have better results in chess 960

Thank you for posting a comment but gukesh has also beaten magnus and magnus has beaten gukesh so I can say both are equal
Well, Carlsen has beaten Naka 14 times in classical chess.
But Naka has also beaten Carlsen, once.
So, the two players are equals.
Did I catch your deep philosophical meditation correctly?

Totally agree:
Aditi is good
Gukesh is better
Magnus is best