19789 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
but nowadays there is a lot of technological improvement and our brains have evolved so if carlsen was in the era of paul i think carlsen would be more than a machine for them!so i choose carlsen and morphy see this game played by paul morphy and see the brilliancy!
thus, this game shows morphy's brilliance but i still think carlsen is much better than morphy!
Who is better?
Mikhail Chigorin, or Tigran Petrosian?
I am better, superior, stronger, excellente, overpowered, than carlsen in my dreams!
If Morphy was time machined to this month there would be at least 2000 people who could beat him in a match.
Paul Morphy had an amazing ability to learn new things from his strong opponents. In his match vs Harrwitz he lost first 2 games, then he won 5. In his match vs Anderssen he lost 1st, drew 2nd and then he started winning, but Anderssen also learned from Morphy, albeit slower, and fought back later with 1 additional victory and 1 draw.
So if Morphy faced Carlsen in a match, he would lose 1-3 initial games and then turn it around. Therefore, Carlsen should win short FIDE knockout match, Morphy any other longer match.
Morphy was the greatest chess player of all time and always will be. He was amazing in open game positions and his only weakness were closed positions like the dutch defence but even then he is still able to win. He only lost 28 games in his career. Bobby Fischer analyzed his games and saw the genius in them. Morphy rarely made blunders and he was feared by many.
It's very simple to say who's better between them:analyze their games with the best chess program that exists nowadays,analyze them at a very great deep level,and see who plays more like the program.
In this way you can see who plays OBJECTIVELY better.
But you also have to consider that they play against human opponents,and sometimes a dubious move is even better than a right one (because even if a sacrifice,for example,is not completely correct,but it increases a lot the pressure on the opponent,he will likely make a mistake)
carslen would smash morphy; he is better at positional play.
Naka is NOT the best blitz player in the world
by nimzomalaysian a few minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by 0110001101101000 2 minutes ago
All The Reasons We Hate V3!
by Connor_Macleod1518 5 minutes ago
More on ChessBazaar's Latvian Set
by cgrau 5 minutes ago
What's your Chess.com setup? Here's mine!
by eaguiraud 6 minutes ago
8/24/2016 - Shock And Awe
by FideiDefensor 6 minutes ago
What do you play against 1.e4?
by happyface79 7 minutes ago
Vote for your favorite chess.com forum moderators...
by Connor_Macleod1518 8 minutes ago
Rematch Request Etiquette
by Diakonia 11 minutes ago
Hi, please I appreaciate that you guys tell me what is the best defense against
by williamn27 11 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!