Mecanicas wrote:
universityofpawns wrote:
Maybe it is an engine....they like to remain anonymous....
Estimated chessmate; (wtf??)
Remember that cheating accusations must not be declared in the forum, and this way. The best thing you can do is contacting Chess.com's support for they investigate a determined user.
Eoin wrote:
that's not an accusation because no name was mentioned.
I was accused in the forums though and nobody gave a crap.
Looking at Rapport's performance in bullet yesterday. It's safe to say that he's not DrTancredi.
carlsen
That would be my bet. I'm surprised that isn't the most popular opinion here. I mean, hello - a confirmed GM just beat Naka by a significant margin in bullet. Of all current players in the world, who do you think is most likely to be capable of doing something like that?
carlsen
That would be my bet. I'm surprised that isn't the most popular opinion here. I mean, hello - a confirmed GM just beat Naka by a significant margin in bullet. Of all current players in the world, who do you think is most likely to be capable of doing something like that?
It seems Hikaru said in chat that it's not Carlsen.
carlsen
That would be my bet. I'm surprised that isn't the most popular opinion here. I mean, hello - a confirmed GM just beat Naka by a significant margin in bullet. Of all current players in the world, who do you think is most likely to be capable of doing something like that?
It seems Hikaru said in chat that it's not Carlsen.
Ahh... that would explain it.
check to see what openings he likes to play, and compare to current top GMs?
Staff will know who it is, but they're unlikely to tell Hikaru if the guy wants to be anonymous.
He destroying IM wonderfultime right now, 12.0 - 2.0. Wonderfultime has a 3000+ bullet rating here.
He also just crossed 3000 bullet.
Maybe someone who hasn't played in last year's Chess.com blitz Championship? We all saw out of these players, only Carlsen can beat Naka in bullet. But if it's not MC, then someone "unknown" for internet chess.
Clearly this is StupidGM, after all, he said he was going to be in the top 10 in a few years...
Clearly this is StupidGM, after all, he said he was going to be in the top 10 in a few years...
No I don't think so. If it was him GM DrTankredi would have lost the match 36-0, despite the engine evaluation being +0.4 in his favour after 20 moves of each game.
Clearly this is StupidGM, after all, he said he was going to be in the top 10 in a few years...
No I don't think so. If it was him GM DrTankredi would have lost the match 36-0, despite the engine evaluation being +0.4 in his favour after 20 moves of each game.
Touche'
Fischer says he's 99% sure it's Short.