Why 2000-2199 OTB ("experts") are weak players

This would have been true in the 1980s, but nowadays the two ratings are much closer.

Mark Glickman derived a formula by comparing the ratings of active players who have both FIDE and USCF ratings:

USrating = 180 + 0.94×FIDE if FIDE ≤ 2000

                   20 + 1.02×FIDE if FIDE > 2000

For USCF 2200, that should be around 2140 (feel free to do the math to get the exact value if you want )

This formula is currently used to assign initial USCF ratings to FIDE-rated players. More information here: http://www.glicko.net/ratings/rating.system.pdf

So I when describing how to analyzing a position you are at lost, never even consider any candidate moves or tree branches because you don't know how to and you are a one mover type.

"You are a one mover type"  Lol, that's the best helpful insult that I have ever read!  Because that describes me too many times!  Now that I know the disease, I can set out to cure it.

Much thanks!! 

Wasnt it Lasker that said he looked 1 move aheadm, when asked how far ahead he looks?

I think some players get too caught up in the "how far ahead do i need to look" Like its a status symbol of how good you think you are.  

Ifi ts a forcing line, its easier to calculate and look deeper.  If its a simple position, it may only require looking ahead 1 move.  Bascially it depends on the position, and ability.

It is more what you look at that is important, When analysing games after the fact I am often surprised that much of the time i spent analysing was wasted as was looking at rubbish, 

Recognising and filtering out rubbish, is key