Don't you trolls ever get tired of making new fake accounts? It's getting old, and tired, and predictable.
Why am i so good in chess?

I don´t kn0w guys, what´s wrong with me, but nobody beats me in chess , i´m boring to play , now i start my games with the move 1.g4 giving a small chance to my opponents, but no way . I feel like if i was a thief or a punisher God of chess. ¿ wat can i do?
Just want to say, you are about the worst troll I have ever seen. Go get a job.
I don´t kn0w guys, what´s wrong with me, but nobody beats me in chess , i´m boring to play , now i start my games with the move 1.g4 giving a small chance to my opponents, but no way . I feel like if i was a thief or a punisher God of chess. ¿ wat can i do?

Haywood may be a troll but he is entertaining
Actually that should be "Haywood is entertaining because he is a good troll."

Don't you trolls ever get tired of making new fake accounts? It's getting old, and tired, and predictable.
Obviously and sadly not. Just give them a free warming e-hug... *shrugs*

Don't you trolls ever get tired of making new fake accounts? It's getting old, and tired, and predictable.
Obviously and sadly not. Just give them a free warming e-hug... *shrugs*
Trolls need to become more creative like they were when the Internet first started.
I agree! And one of the best ways to become more creative is through practice! And you can't practice on chess.com if you don't have an account, or if your old account got banned. So it's a good sign that trolls are constantly creating new accounts!

I suppose chess.com can use this to their advantage, "we have x number of millions of users", though like ~70% is not active and about ~15% is just recycled trolls and another ~10% just casual twitter-fanatic periodical users, who complete/play 1 game of chess per month, leaving the rough estimate of true regular users of that original x million's of users.

I don´t kn0w guys, what´s wrong with me, but nobody beats me in chess , i´m boring to play , now i start my games with the move 1.g4 giving a small chance to my opponents, but no way . I feel like if i was a thief or a punisher God of chess. ¿ wat can i do?
just challenge people higher than 200 in rating. the lowest isn't the best.
Much more than 15% are trolls, I think more than one half. For this, I need to define what a troll is: Someone who speaks a lot, but has nothing to say, or worse (that one would be a small group, but the majority is silent and doesn't show solidarity with the good players who are attacked), someone who distorts, interrupts someone elses remarks on purpose, and enjoys her/his reaction: The one who defends himself accuses himself. This was known to the old Romans, it is known to the (otherwise uneducated) people of second group.
Much more than 15% are trolls, I think more than one half. For this, I need to define what a troll is: Someone who speaks a lot, but has nothing to say, or worse (that one would be a small group, but the majority is silent and doesn't show solidarity with the good players who are attacked), someone who distorts, interrupts someone elses remarks on purpose, and enjoys her/his reaction: The one who defends himself accuses himself. This was known to the old Romans, it is known to the (otherwise uneducated) people of second group.
I think you can read.
I can definitely read. I am pretty sure I maxed out American testing standards for reading. So either you mistyped, english is not your first language or your sentence is unusually constructed. Which is why I asked for clarification. Don't be an ass to me just because people have treated you poorly here in the past. I am not your past, I am a guy asking what are "the people of second group", which by the way would make more sense if it said "said second group" or "the second group" and since this is not the first unusually constructed sentence in your paragraph I wanted clarification. I found it hard to follow in a complete manner.

Rainuchka wrote:
As I said in #16, he did not accept my challenge. It is now open since more than two weeks.
Cause he made this account and post this thread and his last login was the day he made his account.

barakosama wrote:
I don´t kn0w guys, what´s wrong with me, but nobody beats me in chess , i´m boring to play , now i start my games with the move 1.g4 giving a small chance to my opponents, but no way . I feel like if i was a thief or a punisher God of chess. ¿ wat can i do?
What's wrong with you? Oh, you haven't even played a single game on chess.com and you call yourself undefeatable even with 1.g4 lol
Also,I wouldn't trust you even if you do actually play games in real life and beat your opponents. or should I say, "opponents"
Much more than 15% are trolls, I think more than one half. For this, I need to define what a troll is: Someone who speaks a lot, but has nothing to say, or worse (that one would be a small group, but the majority is silent and doesn't show solidarity with the good players who are attacked), someone who distorts, interrupts someone elses remarks on purpose, and enjoys her/his reaction: The one who defends himself accuses himself. This was known to the old Romans, it is known to the (otherwise uneducated) people of second group.
I think you can read.
I can definitely read. I am pretty sure I maxed out American testing standards for reading. So either you mistyped, english is not your first language or your sentence is unusually constructed. Which is why I asked for clarification. Don't be an ass to me just because people have treated you poorly here in the past. I am not your past, I am a guy asking what are "the people of second group", which by the way would make more sense if it said "said second group" or "the second group" and since this is not the first unusually constructed sentence in your paragraph I wanted clarification. I found it hard to follow in a complete manner.
Yes, english is not my first language. But you pretend to be an educated guy by pointing to a test that is not about knowledge.
Furthermore, you deliberately AND STILL ignore and misunderstand what I said.
I made it easy for you, by highlighting it in red. Everyone - including you - knows what kind of people constitute the second group.
I read the first paragraph and I had to comment. Reading is based on knowledge. Spelling is also based on knowledge. It doesnt predict intelligence but they are skills based on knowledge. If you would like to test this, simply find a language you are unaccustomed to and try reading it. Perhaps you do not understand what the word knowledge means. That is understandable.
The second paragraph actually demonstrates the problem. You say "you deliberately AND STILL ignore and misunderstand what I said" , which is why I cannot understand you. It is just too time consuming to explain your errors, but it is understandable; that I can understand your meaning is a step up from your previous posts. I am not trying to make fun of you, I congratulate you what proficiency you have, but you english is not great and if that is embarrassing it is better you know it and correct it than have everyone unable to follow your statements. Perhaps if, instead of gettting angry with me, you had simply tried to restate your case you would have found your grammar improved through practice and/or helpful tips. As it stands, I wish our future conversations to be brief because conversing with you is laborious beyond what should be called for, even when communicating with someone who is not proficient in english. So, good day to you.
STILL, you do not want to admit, that you understood what I mean.
This is incredible.
You are a troll of the worst kind.
You still do not want to admit that you understood what I meant.
You are incredible.
The last sentence seems without error, but I think it would read easier if you typed: You are the worst kind of troll.
I wonder if you are an idiot in your own country, I wonder if you type sentences as sloppily in your own language as you do in english. I am guessing you are like 18, right?
Again, you do not admit that the sense of my inputs was clear to everyone, including you. I will not make the mistake to react further on your remarks on my language - the last input is the only where you made something precise, but funnily it it is plain wrong. In fact, you can say both: '...I mean', or '...I meant', you can also say both 'you are a troll of the worst kind' and 'you are the worst kind of troll'.
Again, I will not react to any of your old or new remarks. Because a University Professor in Mathematics who is over 50 years old doesn't need to.
the sense of my inputs was clear to everyone (are you serious?)
"but funnily it it is plain wrong. " (The irony, lol)
In fact, you can say both: '...I mean', or '...I meant' (you can say both but they mean different things, since the tenses are different. )
you can also say both 'you are a troll of the worst kind' and 'you are the worst kind of troll'. ( I admitted as much, it appears as though reading is as tough for you as writing)
Again, I will not react to any of your old or new remarks. Because a University Professor in Mathematics who is over 50 years old doesn't need to. (No one needs to do anything, but you OUGHT to be polite so that the conversations go smoothly instead of turning personal)
Edit: I removed a name I called you, which I felt described your behavior. While it felt good to tell you off it will do no good for improving your communication skills.
I don´t kn0w guys, what´s wrong with me, but nobody beats me in chess , i´m boring to play , now i start my games with the move 1.g4 giving a small chance to my opponents, but no way . I feel like if i was a thief or a punisher God of chess. ¿ wat can i do?