Why are people mad over Fischer, Carlsen etc?

This forum highlights a very sensitive issue and which is statistically more likely to be met with negative approach. However, I am going to go on.

When one glances over the hot topics on chess.com forums, one inevitably sees the controversial issues of Fischer, Capablanca or the comparison of who is the best player being discussed (the general contenderes of which are Kasparov, Fischer and Carlsen). However, one rarely sees sincere game analyses (though one can view many if goes deeper), classics being reviewed and genuine technical doubts. The game is also rarely viewed on a lighter note. 

So please, improve the quality of your content, and if you can't, post it in the off-topic zone even if it isn't.

Beautifully put in a few words!

Malicious, malcontented, malevolent misanthropic trolls like to cause flame wars, divisive rancour and acrimonious conflict.

Their favourite bait is Bobby Fischer.

The latest provocative puerilty being ; Bobby Fischer lacked creativity.

The irony of my swallowing the bait is not lost on me....but still.

Maybe somewhere, Bobby is p***ing himself laughing !