Chess.com's rating system has a component which adjusts ratings quickly up and down for new or long inactive players.
The idea is to get ratings to an accurate level as quickly as possible.
The screenshot you posted just shows that an accuracy score was generated during a Game Review. It doesn't have anything to do with a Fair Play review.
Stop locking the threads, and let us know what the problem is.
Getting your rating jacked up and then losing according to chess.com's rules is essentially what I did. How is it fair to me to get 100s of points which I don't deserve and then lose constantly? That is what YOUR system has. That is what YOUR system does. You are just "sandbagging" slower than I am. You have controls of the rating points and you can give me 100+ points on my first win, but then you slow YOUR SANDBAGGING down by only reducing my rating with something like 80 points, then 40, then 20, etc...
How come it is ok for YOU to do this, but me, who wants to go incrementally by 10 points a win, gets my account closed for most likely a false sandbagging accusation. I am trying to correct YOUR wrong of inflating my rating. Then you accuse me of sandbagging. This is unjust and unfair to the users of the site.
Let us determine how we want our rating points accumulated.
Here is a screenshot and I am saving it. Stop locking threads, and let us discuss this issue. I will not be emailing and waiting for a response. I would like to play chess, enjoy chess, and get the points I deserve the way we deserve by not jacking up the ratings by 100s. That means we play dumb at a low level then to fool the system. Do you really prefer me to play dumb and fool the system? Or will you allow me to play fairly with 10 points being awarded fairly instead of unjustly 100 points?