I don't, because it really doesn't matter if I have a queen or not. Chances of winning are still quite slim....lol
ah, a person who I can relate to
I don't, because it really doesn't matter if I have a queen or not. Chances of winning are still quite slim....lol
ah, a person who I can relate to
the point is, for an example, let's look at soccer. If you go 4-0 down, can you resign? It would be a disgrace if you did, and frankly that's the case here. Just because you've lost 9 points and an important piece doesn't mean you lose. You have a rook, bishop, knight and most importantly, your king. There has been many games where you can lose your queen and still win. It's not a matter of time, it's about telling your opponent you still care about the match. It's in chess.com rules not to resign unless you need, and losing your queen isn't a good excuse, is it?
That is definitely NOT in chess.com's rules. And for soccer to be like chess, a team would have to lose a player or players every time their opponents scored.
Exactly. Unlike in soccer, in chess the advantage snowballs. But I dont mind ppl playing on in any position.
https://support.chess.com/article/676-is-it-rude-to-resign-or-should-i-play-to-checkmate
It is definitely NOT rude to resign! If you are tired of playing and want to start a new game, you can definitely resign, that's what the button is there for!
You might also wonder, is it rude to keep playing in a lost position? This also is not rude, and some chess coaches even encourage their students to always play to checkmate, not only for the learning experience, but because beginners often blunder, and you never know when your opponent might mess up!
What IS rude, is stalling. This is when someone who is in a lost position delays the game as long as possible to make the other player wait! As long as you are not doing this, you can feel free to play on, or resign, whichever you decide!
One day I lost my queen against 13 hundred in offline tournament, I got sad, I was going to resign when I suddenly saw my opponent lost on time
Yes its possible
My opponent thought so much to trap my queen he forgot to look at his time after 2 moves of losing my queen, he lost on time
Outcome of the game when you lose your queen almost always favors your opponent and will happen 99%. They just resign to not waste time since them losing is more likely than anything else.
Even if you loose 99% of the games after loosing your queen, i don't think that it is a waste of time. Continue to play after loosing my queen highly improved my ability to play with minor pieces, especially the bishops.
If you're loosing your queen late in the game, resigning is an option, but early in the game, just continue.
I think a thread with the best comebacks would be nice.
Outcome of the game when you lose your queen almost always favors your opponent and will happen 99%. They just resign to not waste time since them losing is more likely than anything else.
Even if you loose 99% of the games after loosing your queen, I don't think that it is a waste of time. Continue to play after loosing my queen highly improved my ability to play with minor pieces, especially the bishops.
If you're loosing your queen late in the game, resigning is an option, but early in the game, just continue.
I think a thread with the best comebacks would be nice.
you're right, resigning is just giving up, but every one in this world should never give up, Try your best (Like I did), Fight till the game is over
resigning is just giving up, but every one in this world should never give up, Try your best (Like I did), Fight till the game is over
Resigning is acknowledging your loss without forcing your opponent to checkmate you. It's the norm in chess. If you want to play every game out, never resigning, that's fine too.
And one more question why do you have to give up your queen or make it trapped, think hard and trap opponents queen
? im am only talking to cheesey_dibbles