Why do you suppose somebody rated 1757 would challenge
Sort:
Maybe he saw you trolling and wanted to pound you like a little kid, I know I would.
i sometimes do that
SerbianChessStar wrote:
Maybe he saw you trolling and wanted to pound you like a little kid, I know I would.
You sound like a MAJOR nut job, or a nerd.
Do I...? Or do you?
YOU.
woodshover wrote:
YOU.
what about me?
*Ahem* Aside from the trolling and retorts that could really use some work, I don't really see anything wrong here. The lower rated player has nothing to lose, and if you can't pick up anything at all, then I would suggest reviewing the game more carefully afterwards. I personally don't go seeking out lower rated players, but I will usually play anyone who accepts my seeks, no matter what their rating.
What the hell is trolling?
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
RDR75 wrote:
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
okkk........ I, for one, challenge all my friends the moment I make friends with him/her.
Now I'm wondering why a FM would.
I believe i said this earlier.. people love beating on trolls.
SerbianChessStar wrote:
I believe i said this earlier.. people love beating on trolls.
I guess you should know, being the biggest one on here.
woodshover wrote:
SerbianChessStar wrote:
I believe i said this earlier.. people love beating on trolls.
I guess you should know, being the biggest one on here.
LOL
yo why u sending me notes little troll? go annoy someone else.
Maybe he or she just enjoys a challenge. 
Is it not, after all, about having fun?
maybe they wanted to learn how to suck at chess 
SerbianChessStar wrote:
woodshover wrote:
SerbianChessStar wrote:
I believe i said this earlier.. people love beating on trolls.
I guess you should know, being the biggest one on here.
LOL
yo why u sending me notes little troll? go annoy someone else.
The only not I'm sending you is one telling you you're blocked, you moronic little jackass.
what's the problem if the player is a 1000 points below playing a person 1000 higher than them. I would see this as a good thing because the lower rated player can use the game as a learning experience and the higher rated player probably just wants a game of chess and besides ratting should be only concerned about when their playing in official ratted tournaments. when a player is in a section e.g Minors, Majors, challengers and masters if the player is barley in the section or barley under the appoved ratting standard
Not much of a learning experience. I don't learn a whole lot by playing someone rated 2400, I just see my pieces disappearing. Now when I play someone 300-400 points higher than me, then I can learn something because I sort of understand what they are doing.
I've already taken the chalenge. I agree with what you say here too.