Why there's no classical time control rating in chess.com?

Sort:
Avatar of Hoffmann713
nklristic ha scritto:

The bulk of rapid rating here is achieved through 10 minute games, and those are still blitz OTB. 10 minute for a game of chess is nothing special. It is not so different than 5|5 game for instance, it is actually a bit more treacherous. You think you have some time, but you actually do not.

I agree. Just as a 20|20 game and a 10|0 are two completely different worlds, it doesn't make sense to call them both "rapid" in my opinion.

I also hope that they will separate rapid and classical ratings

Avatar of DarkMechaKnightSwordX
nklristic wrote:
DarkMechaKnightSwordX wrote:

Would be really cool if they made 60+ a new rating group and added a few more controls to it.

I would like that, but realistically I don't think they will ever do it. Too few people are playing those type of games. Under 1 500, there are some people playing this, though still less than other time controls. Over 1 500, only a handful of people.

To get someone my level, I have to wait for a long time, and even then it is in many cases someone 200 points lower than me. I had an excursion in 30|0 games last year and my rating got to almost 1 800. I was able to play it for around 2 months or so, and I ended up going back to 60|0 games (of course my rating followed, because there are simply almost never players rated 1 800 and above there).

And that is a shame because 30|0 and faster time controls, it is simply not the same for me, I get frustrated because there is a point where I have to play some move, where I know there is a chance I would find something better in a longer game.

I actually think the reason why there are few people at 60+ is because you can gain rapid rating at faster controls so there is little incentive to play anything slower. If it's made a new group the player count should go up considerably.

Avatar of Suandy9_2

What did I do wrong?

Avatar of Suandy9_2

Avatar of Suandy9_2

Avatar of BigChessplayer665

All the person did was take a free queen why are they so mad ?

Avatar of Suandy9_2

I didn't know they kept losing and were very angry with me😄

Avatar of MariasWhiteKnight
tygxc wrote:

It strains the eyes too much to stare at a screen for hours.

Err... say what ?

The computer monitor is further away (typically about 80cm) than a OTB chessboard would be.

Avatar of Suandy9_2

that's right I tried to read the computer algorithm

Avatar of nklristic
DarkMechaKnightSwordX wrote:
nklristic wrote:
DarkMechaKnightSwordX wrote:

Would be really cool if they made 60+ a new rating group and added a few more controls to it.

I would like that, but realistically I don't think they will ever do it. Too few people are playing those type of games. Under 1 500, there are some people playing this, though still less than other time controls. Over 1 500, only a handful of people.

To get someone my level, I have to wait for a long time, and even then it is in many cases someone 200 points lower than me. I had an excursion in 30|0 games last year and my rating got to almost 1 800. I was able to play it for around 2 months or so, and I ended up going back to 60|0 games (of course my rating followed, because there are simply almost never players rated 1 800 and above there).

And that is a shame because 30|0 and faster time controls, it is simply not the same for me, I get frustrated because there is a point where I have to play some move, where I know there is a chance I would find something better in a longer game.

I actually think the reason why there are few people at 60+ is because you can gain rapid rating at faster controls so there is little incentive to play anything slower. If it's made a new group the player count should go up considerably.

Well, there is that, and probably some people would play it to gain a separate rating, though the incentive today is that it is a very different experience than 10l0, which is obviously not enough to draw people in. happy.png

I feel that it is actually a very good training for those who are interested in classical OTB chess, as it is the closest time control to it.

Avatar of Suandy9_2

The comments are quite good and very accurate, but when I play chess directly in my city, up to now no one has been able to beat me at playing chess because I often practice chess. com😁

Avatar of QueenOfAsgard

I tried to play 30+20 thinking its classical only to find out its Rapid, so i googled to see if they have classical control only to see it doesnt exist, totally insane.

Avatar of Mouselip

I swear I saw a Danny Rensch tweet recently saying they were going to make a classical rating pool.

The reason I only play classical time controls on Lichess is because I am not going to play a long game here and have it rated along with my rapid games.

Until this site gets a classical rating pool I am virtually forced to play elsewhere for long games.

I just played a 60/30 game that I can analyze in my chess dojo cohort. It did not take long for an opponent near my level to accept.

Avatar of AstralWanderer1972

Add my vote in favor of eventually adding a classical rating pool. One idea would be to remove the 60 minute time control from the rapid category (have it end at 30/0 or add a 45/0 or 45/10 as the slowest rapid game), and make a classical time controls of 60, 90, and 120 minutes available.