Will computers ever solve chess?

What is your concern, or what do you not understand?

lol - the video above even shows koalas can fly.😝

You read the post.  There are no words in it an adult should/could/would not grasp.  Your feigned questioning about a post that has no questions in it is just your usual circular BS.  Its the refuge of the unimaginative and the less than competent to opt out with non-sequiturs when things get too challenging.  I bet your go-to response to childhood banter was "I know you are, but what am I?", also a favorite method for avoiding addressing anything.

P.S. If you want to keep making fun of yourself by keeping the koala metaphor alive, be my guest.  It's doing double duty for me.  The thread passes over from veiled garbage, your favored environment, to overt garbage, which buries your misinformation.

You understand now - just because something has not been done is not proof that it cannot be done.

Well, I just played this game against the Level 10 computer...

Another day, another straw man.

  Is this supposed to make a point, pertinent to our discussion?! Or is it one of those things people drop in a discussion, that have nothing to do with anything being discussed?!

This was supposed to be a question on weather this computer can solve chess or not.  I am asking for you to share your opinion not rant on me.

‘Rant’ is the immature interpretation of a brain which posed an illogical question. It is illogical, right? Because no existent computer can solve chess, and an insignificant game played by a human—you—against a mediocre computer, at least from the point of view of being able to calculate all the possible variants, which is the kind of computer that can solve chess, as explained in the posts above, is obviously  meaningless.

I agree.

all player chess are gay and are no happening life

Another open question is "will computers ever solve football?".

which one?

 Computers can only solve closed systems/games, like chess,  not open systems like life or games like football.

Firstly, did you think my question was serious?

Secondly, you are wrong, in that it is certainly feasible for a computer to seek optimal strategies for complex, interactive, goal-oriented activities like football, and it is even just about conceivable that one would find the optimal strategy that likely exists (some extrapolated theorem of game theory), given careful problem definition. One observation as someone familiar with relevant AI techniques is that although it might seem necessary to have full knowledge of the physical capabilities and behaviour of the players, these are things that could be simultaneously learnt while seeking a good strategy. What is essential is having feedback on results, and receiving enough other observations that are relevant (in principle this could simply be video).

Note that this is certainly a very complex task, like others involving interaction with an open environment (such as autonomous driving in unknown places), but most AI researchers would agree with my statement of feasibility.

Note that robot soccer is a long-established test bed for co-operative AI-powered robots, but it is fair to say that thus far the standard of play is not terribly high.