AnthonyCG wrote:
guptesumedh wrote:
N & K vs K is a draw due to insufficient material,but N & K vs N & K is not a draw because as shown in post 9, one's own knight can help opponent to checkmate.
That's stupid...
So in this position whoever has more time just wins? That doesn't sound like chess to me...
Look at post #9 & post #49 before commenting
A lot of you people have no idea whatsoever what you are talking about and I doubt you care either. You keep adding pieces and theorizing according to that information even though it has zero to do with what happened. For the last time ever.......I had a king and a knight my opponent had a king and a knight.
How hard is that to keep straight?
Now that I have slept on it I should have either made the 50 moves and gotten the draw or forgotten about it, but at the time I just couldn't fathom anyone doing that for a few points.