Would u trade???...

Sort:
Avatar of Dallasuckatchess

Very simple here...assuming all things are equal in position and material...

1) 3 minors for Queen

2) 2 minors for Rook(assume not but situationally? ie active rook for

Bad bishop and knight, etc)

3) break a staunch pawn chain w knight or bad bishop for a pawn or 2

4) 3 minors for a queen

5) 2 rooks for queen

6) 2 bishops for 2 knights or vise versa

Avatar of Scottrf

Really it depends completely on the position. But will try and answer.

1. Really depends how good the pieces are and how many targets/open lines the queen has.

2. Would take the 2 pieces in the opening/middlegame, less likely to in an endgame.

3. If there's an extra attack, the pawns are passed, or it creates some sort of weakness. Otherwise no. I think people are too quick to do this in general.

5. 2 rooks are probably better if they both have open lines and the queen doesn't have targets.

6. I would trade 2 knights for 2 bishops, not vice versa in most positions.

Avatar of upen2002
Dallasuckatchess wrote:

Very simple here...assuming all things are equal in position and material...

1) 3 minors for Queen

2) 2 minors for Rook(assume not but situationally? ie active rook for

Bad bishop and knight, etc)

3) break a staunch pawn chain w knight or bad bishop for a pawn or 2

4) 3 minors for a queen

5) 2 rooks for queen

6) 2 bishops for 2 knights or vise versa

Point 1 and 4 are same I totally agree withScottrf