Would you rather have a strong bishop pair or a strong knight outpost?

Sort:
Avatar of chesswithpatrick

Hey everyone! As part of my Winter Blunderland series on Youtube, I am posting a question every day in December. Today's question: Would you rather have a strong bishop pair or a strong knight outpost?

I've heard that having a bishop pair in the end game is very powerful, but I've found that an outpost can be more satisfying as I tend to always look for tactics that that involved sacrificing my knight (even though I don't think I should.... it's just pretty satisfying.)

I can't really remember many times where I actually got to use the bishop pair, so I thought I'd ask the group.
Thanks again for your support on my journey!
-Patrick

Avatar of SomeoneonEarth0123456789

I mean it really depends on how good my other minor piece is if I choose the knight

Avatar of SomeoneonEarth0123456789

Hmm unless you mean 2 strong knight outposts or the strong bishop pair. In that case the bishops under most circumstances, as most often I can just trade my bishops off for the knights at worst case scenario, while in the best I win because of my bishops. However sometimes it is impossible to trade the knights off or if I do I will lose and so in those cases I guess it really depends on what the knights and bishops are doing in the position.

Avatar of Senator-StevenArmstrong

1. If the position is semi-closed or completely closed, I'll take the knight on the outpost

2. If the position is open, I'll take a strong bishop pair.

Avatar of EnCrossiantIsBrilliant

strong bishop pair

Avatar of MayTheChikenBeWithYou

knights any day of the week

Avatar of Stephen-Chess38

Really comes down to open vs. closed game and how many pieces are left. The more major pieces my opponent has left the more I like having the knight on an outpost.

Avatar of ThePersonAboveYou

Bishop pair looks inanpropraite

Avatar of Eyes1289

This comment is more for entertainment than education but I think it depends on the piece accuracy of your bishop pair vs how good you are with your knight or knights... Personally I don't consider myself accurate with either and I probably would have sacrificed one of the bishops and a knight before endgame

Avatar of lucca

It really depends on the position, but I prefer Knight outposts. He can control many squares in the opponent's position.

In the example above, the d5-knight is much stronger than the bishop on f6.
Avatar of DamianoChess98

i know that theoretically bishop are worth 3.15 so they are better in the longrun, but i'm not stockfish nor a top 50 player so i prefer the outposts cause knights are tricky and cooler to use. It doesn't matter what's slightly better if you blunder a king and pawn endgame anyway grin.png

Avatar of Kustomized

Bishop pairs tend to be worth more as your elo increases. "Knights are tricky b*st*rds" - is a common saying, especially because early on, players tend to miss simple captures and tactics with the knight.

Avatar of 8Winters8

Jumbo Pony

Avatar of Cazad0r75
Senator-StevenArmstrong wrote:

1. If the position is semi-closed or completely closed, I'll take the knight on the outpost

2. If the position is open, I'll take a strong bishop pair.

This

Avatar of kapurthala777

Strong bishop pair

Avatar of dmc76642
I like me some knights. But a strong bishop pair projects influence across the board, even in a closed position.
Avatar of EasyJayChess

I prefer closed positions, so Knights work better for me. However, it sure is nice to have two bishops in the end game.

Avatar of DCthedestroyer

Knight outpost cuz I have more insight on outposts. Bishop pair is also good since I often have open positions.

Avatar of argent379

I'm happiest when I have at least one bishop and my opponent at most one, and knight outposts are usually easier to get rid of. Bishop pair, for certain.

Avatar of Sobrukai

I love knight outposts, and oftentimes I use them to turn around a bad-looking game. Here's a game where I played pretty poorly but was able to turn things around with an extremely strong knight and supporting bishop.