Ziryab wrote:
Chess problems end when you win three points of material. Why should an impure game last longer than pure problems?
so after sacking three pawns in the danish gambit white should resign??
You Should Be Forced to Resign
Sort:
TetsuoShima wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
Chess problems end when you win three points of material. Why should an impure game last longer than pure problems?
so after sacking three pawns in the danish gambit white should resign??
That depends, is the "two move rule" still in play?
mykingdomforanos wrote:
chessgdt wrote:
Likhit1 wrote:
Ubik42 wrote:
Face it, the naysayers, haters and malcontents do not have a leg to stand on. 5 points to resign has won the logical argument and is here to stay. Mathematics wins.
Do you think anybody is taking you seriously?Excluding Peter ofcourse.
He's enjoying himself mocking Peter XD.
or so he thinks.
mykingdomforanos wrote:
lol
oops! typo! that should have read " so you stink" @chessgdt.
oops! typo!
Guys.....This guy is an absolute troll...Please, STOP trolls.
Dont be stupid ya blithering idiot..what you gonna do put me to the question? What are you some sort of early warning system..Funny!
CHCL wrote:
Guys.....I is an absolute troll...Please, STOP trolls.
troll - most likely, thread close to 1k - definitely. 90 bottles of bee.. er comments to go.
Thread is running out of steam...
CHCL wrote:
Guys.....This guy is an absolute troll...Please, STOP trolls.
Not before 50th page !
(and at the 50th page, someone will have to write 'not before 100th page' if I don't think of it)
What's this thread about again?
85 more post to 1000...
Iron Tiger......I love your cat!! What's his take on this ridiculously long thread?? His/her, I should say. Beautiful animal.
bsharpchess wrote:
Iron Tiger......I love your cat!! What's his take on this ridiculously long thread?? His/her, I should say. Beautiful animal.
What kind of off-topic are you trying to pull here ? Come on, we are serious here. And I have no cat. The picture is the first result when you type "paper tiger" in google images.
If any player is unable to make a legal move= itis proper for that player to consder a stale mate=but never to resign= only if he is checkmate should he resign
PLAVIN79 wrote:
If any player is unable to make a legal move= itis proper for that player to consder a stale mate=but never to resign= only if he is checkmate should he resign
Even if you have no legal moves, you shouldn't consider stalemate. Always go for checkmate instead.
no you should'nt be froced to resign take a look at this.
your getting offf-topic
Chess problems end when you win three points of material. Why should an impure game last longer than pure problems?