I average around 70% accuracy on both rapid and blitz but I'm pretty sure I play better (or less bad, I kind of suck at chess in general) in my rapid games. Which also my rating indicates (around 1050 rapid vs 650 blitz). So I wounder if the accuracy score is calculated different for rapid and blitz?
And my blitz rating is 400 points lower than rapid, are they really comparable? I think my oponents at 600-700 level blitz play way better than when I was at that level on rapid.
And a third question: is it somehow possible to get an accuracy score for all your games played, without having to do a game report for each of them (which would take very long time since I, despite my rather mediocre rating, have played more than 1000 games in total)? I thought it would be interesting to see how the accuracy has changed over time,
Accuracy calculations are the same for all time controls.
Ratings aren't the same across differing time controls. A 600 rated blitz player may be tougher than a 600 rapid player.
There is no way to get all your games scored without running the report.
A further complication is that chess.com has just changed the accuracy calculations.
I average around 70% accuracy on both rapid and blitz but I'm pretty sure I play better (or less bad, I kind of suck at chess in general) in my rapid games. Which also my rating indicates (around 1050 rapid vs 650 blitz). So I wounder if the accuracy score is calculated different for rapid and blitz?
And my blitz rating is 400 points lower than rapid, are they really comparable? I think my oponents at 600-700 level blitz play way better than when I was at that level on rapid.
And a third question: is it somehow possible to get an accuracy score for all your games played, without having to do a game report for each of them (which would take very long time since I, despite my rather mediocre rating, have played more than 1000 games in total)? I thought it would be interesting to see how the accuracy has changed over time,