Forums

How is the Avg. Diff calculated in the chess analysis of a game?

Sort:
mellowplay

There have been games where I made less mistakes than my opponent and better moves and my number was higher than his like 1.27 and his .67. But in similar cases my number would be lower and there's would be higher like .67 for me and 1.44 for them. So I am having difficulty understanding what the Avg. Diff signifies. Can anyone help?

notmtwain
mellowplay wrote:

There have been games where I made less mistakes than my opponent and better moves and my number was higher than his like 1.27 and his .67. But in similar cases my number would be lower and there's would be higher like .67 for me and 1.44 for them. So I am having difficulty understanding what the Avg. Diff signifies. Can anyone help?

Surely you know that computers evaluate positions in terms of material. A position of plus one indicates that the computer thinks you are ahead a pawn and an evaluation of plus 3 means that you are ahead by a piece (and all other things being equal, you should win).

Avg. Diff. is the average difference between the computer evaluation of the position using the best possible move it has found in the position and the evaluation using your actual move.

So if the computer looks at a position and sees a move to win a minor piece (worth 3 points) and you played some random move that in fact gave up that possibility, the difference in evaluations would be 3.  If you miss winning a piece on every move, the avg. diff. would be 3.

If your avg. diff. is 1.27, it means that the computer says your moves are losing you the equivalent of more than one and a quarter pawns on each turn.

Of course, averages don't count for anything by themselves. What counts is who gets mate.  You can lose almost all your pieces and still win.

You may make a lower number of mistakes but if you only one very big one, you can lose. 

xt8088

Thank you! I had the same question as OP and this answer is clear!

L8Bloomer13

Thank you for the excellent explanation.

Xckid77

Yes. Thanks for that explanation notmtwain. Very helpful.

berlinhusker
Thanks! I have been wondering what that was all about for some time now.
ThatChapThere

Just one point: Computers don't evaluate solely based on material. This would make stockfish play like a patzer. I doesn't exactly mean that your evaluation would be low if you sacrifice, but if you're down and the your opponent blunders mate notmtwain is rigt.

Tettamanti

Nice explanation!!!

wishiwonthatone

and i jump on the wagon! had same question and found great answer. 

 

mtwain said:

If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.

 

 

fishgebart

everything that they saied.thx

Im_YOUR_nightmear

So higher the better or lower the number is better?