Players Rated Between 1750 and 1999 Who Are Serious In Improving Their Chess

Sort:
ponz111

Players who have a rating [slow or fast] between 1750 and 1999, please contact ponz111 for possible help.

If you are serious in improving your chess you may contact me by message.

Tell me about yourself. What openings you play? What you know about the endgame? How good or bad you are at tactics? How long have you been playing? What methods do you use to learn chess?  What speed or speeds do you use for chess? Anything else, you wish to tell me...

I do not charge for my help to serious players.

ponz111     [David Taylor]

dpnorman

What can you do to help such players? My rating fluctuates from 1750 to 1850 and I have been hitting the first plateau of my life in the last five months (I am 16 years old). This is frustrating because my goal is 2200.

I'm decent at tactics. I play a wide range of openings which are mainly based on positional play and avoiding mega-theory, although considering my age, perhaps this is a bit odd. I am very bad at endgames and I also have a major issue with time trouble- I play very poorly when I don't have much time due to simple oversights. As I tell a lot of people, even though I am 16, it seems that I play chess like an old man, which is somewhat alarming because I figure that when I am an old man, I will be even more like this! However, unlike older players, my endgame play is also not good. My best areas include most openings and also positional/thematic middlegames. I am also not bad at defending (unless I blunder, which happens more frequently than it should).

Yesterday I was very close to getting my first win over a master, as I refuted his gambit and was up a pawn for not enough compensation the whole game after defending well against his attack, but with three minutes left I blundered into a fork.

ponz111

dnorman if you wish me to help you, the first step is to send me a message.

same with PaulEChess though i read your blog and think i can help.

each individual needs a certain type of training, depending on many circumstances.

EugenD

@dpnorman - mastering the endgame is mandatory to get to the next step

@ponz111 - Dave, it is not a good idea to give free lessons; nothing worth learning should be free if only for the efforts you put into it in the first place. When you do offer it for free, you just lower the bar, expectations, effort of potential students, etc. Just expressing my own opinion after 21 years and counting of teaching chess...

913Glorax12

Kind of a downer there

dpnorman

@EugenD Don't ruin it for the rest of us. Besides, I'm just trying to see what he can do for me; I take lessons with coaches in real life and it's not like Mr. Taylor is going to become my coach or anything.

ponz111

For now I am closing my offer.  Have received some responses and will concentrate on those I have received. thank you.

Earth64

I am good at teaching but bad at learning.

SilentKnighte5

How did this work out?