chess.com ratings are deflated against USCF

But, somehow, you did not think it might be worth a link or a requote.

If you couldn't understand it the first three times, you won't get it the fourth time.

That's just how trolls roll.

They'll ask the same question over and over, and keep pretending they don't understand.

How's this, Adam: 

Don't answer the question, but provide us the post #s where you have answered it already. 

I'm here to talk to people who understand what I'm saying, not those who just want to argue endlessly. I've got better things to do with my time than waste it on you.

Rinkleff turned from a statistician with a argument to a demoralized, disillusioned, angry little troll in the space of 16 months.

I used to agree with him. Now I just watch for the latest crazy outburst.

I know, right?

Could you quit spamming this thread with your inane comments?

Yeah, Ubik! Stop spamming! Let Adam and his sock puppet accounts do all the spamming for you.

I thought I was being polite and sympathetic. And whats that other word...starts with a c...

Interpretation....

I am here to chat with people who agree with me, so we can collectively continue to change the subject, leaving behind the posts containing the questions and claims that, deal my ascertions critical blows. Otherwise the premise of this thread is dead but, I'd rather try to make the truth what I want it to be, to serve my own purposes. Get off my back already, I am tired of dodging you all.

What makes you think that people have nothing better to do than explain things to you? If you don't understand, sorry. Plenty of people understood what I said, I'm not going to debate people who are rude and deliberately ignorant.

lol

I predict a sockpuppet smackdown in a few minutes.

"Explaining myself to you would be a waste of time.  Instead I'm going to use 5x as much time explaining why I'm not going to waste my time on you."

I've already explained this repeatedly, and plenty of people have agreed that what I said made sense. If you are still here arguing, its only because you want to cause trouble. I'm not going to debate you, because you clearly lack any sincere desire to understand.

I feel its worth taking some time to explain this to you, in the hopes that you learn to grow up and stop trolling the forums. If you don't agree with what someone says, just move on, and quit trying to stir up disagreement. Stop spamming threads, just because you want attention from the original poster.

I get it, you disagree with what I said. Ok! I'm not going to talk to you about it. So why are you still here? I'm here because I made the original post, and because I'm trying to have a conversation with the adults, but you have no reason to be here other than the fact that you are looking for argument.

I honestly don't think it matters what I say. You will disagree regardless, because your sole interest here is to debate endlessly. Nobody owes you an explanation of anything, and I will not encourage you by trying to explain what has already been discussed.

I was going to allude to projection in the earlier post that prompted this quote by you. Instead I decided to wait until you proved it for me by your own admission. You didn't disappoint. I find when trolls really start grabbing at thin air for a basis in their posts, it doesn't take long for the accusations to fly. Another attempt to circumvent answering to anyone's ascertions...your hole is deep enough. You are only burying yourself now.

A good friend of mine did some statistics and a graph on this sort of thing, comparing USCF ratings with various ratings on the site: http://www.chess.com/article/view/chesscom-rating-comparisons

I would trust him before I'd trust what has been posted here, and it looks like you can generally expect your blitz rating to be roughly 100 points below the USCF rating. You can argue those stats, especially due to the relatively small sample size. However he has a degree in Statistics, so good luck.

my chess.com rating is 1410 online chess, but my USCF is 997