13400 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hi everyone, long time reader, first time poster. Im at a moderate to beginner level, 1500 standard, 1340 blitz, 1100 bullet.
i was listening to coach dan heisman, and he said that he encouraged people to play 2-3 slow games a week to keep sharp. and he said people who play 1 game a week can still maintain their skills.
the problem, and i guess the question is: i play literally a hundred games a week, blitz and bullet, a few half hour time control games, but i dont know if all this playing makes me better... i just love the game, i love playing.
do you find that just playing games has ever made you better, or do you find you have to take a step back and only improve through exercises and reading?
Never play bullet if you want to get better. It's a game entirely different from chess that fools your mind into thinking it's chess, so unlike other non-chess games, it will compromise your long games in chess.
Bobby Fischer had some unnice things to say about blitz chess (ie 5 min games in particular not necessarily bullet chess specifically) although he won a super-strong 5 min tnmt 2 full pts ahead of the 2nd-place winner, Tal.
Overall I agree with kenpo - and wafflemaster, even though I prefer French Toast!
Have to ask yourself if you play chess to have fun, or if you want to move improvement to the top of your priorities.
Improvement and fun aren't mutually exclusive, but hundreds of blitz games a week (with no serious study and practice) are
what about even the longer time controls on the site?
do you think a 30 min time control is enough to think about all your moves and start to improve the way you see the board?
30 minutes is sufficient time. It won't screw you up.
I suggest training more than playing. If you do MANY tactics you'll get better to recognize opportunity... so in blitz, play your repertory (short one) and jump on opportunity... stop when you feel tired 'cause overdose won't serve you. Have fun !
Why not ask Caruana, Nakamura, Carlsen, Vachier-Lagrave....
These guys are trying to win the world championship. Do you really think they would play THOUSANDS of bullet games if they thought it would hurt their chances to win the one title that matters to them?
I love lightning; in fact, I got to the point where I play it exclusively. I agree with the comment that it is a different game in a sense - and, to me, that is not a bad thing whatsoever.Play what you find fun and pick the style that suits you most. I wouldn't even play anymore if it weren't for lightning.
Right. I've always despised bullet and blitz chess.
by dragonair234 a few minutes ago
Broken pages - old & new version
by BRENDA a few minutes ago
by edwardseungwonjeong 3 minutes ago
North Korean Players
by macer75 7 minutes ago
Asking advice in the Benoni
by eaguiraud 7 minutes ago
Can You Castle on Both Sides of the King?
by macer75 13 minutes ago
Can't find the videos
by Clifton_Prince 15 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal World Champions
by Jimmy720 16 minutes ago
best song to listen to while playing chess
by ChessPlayinDude47 16 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!