From the evidence I gathered...I have no idea
kicked
From the evidence I gathered...I have no idea
I am a better detective than you then!
You may be a better oracle than I
From the evidence I gathered...I have no idea
I am a better detective than you then!
You may be a better oracle than I
Just because you do not understand it does not mean it is magic.
From the evidence I gathered...I have no idea
I am a better detective than you then!
You may be a better oracle than I
Just because you do not understand it does not mean it is magic.
True
The mathematics of this question is quite simple (without further information). You will get kicked if and only if you break rules A, B, C, D, etc. In other words: (A or B or C or D or ...) <-> K.
If you just tell us K, then we can imply A or B or C or D or etc. In other words: K -> (A or B or C or D or ...). It is not possible to determine which specific rule you broke, but we know you did break one.
You seem to be arguing the validity of (A or B or C or D or ...) <-> K.
We don't know a rule has been broken, we can only assume the OP has broken a rule based on the entertainment value.
We don't know a rule has been broken, we can only assume the OP has broken a rule based on the entertainment value.
It's "if and only if," so we can imply a broken rule. However, we don't know if he has been kicked other than he said so. Hmmm. If the crow cries "kicked," has he been kicked or does he just want corn?
We don't know a rule has been broken, we can only assume the OP has broken a rule based on the entertainment value.
It's "if and only if," so we can imply a broken rule. However, we don't know if he has been kicked other than he said so. Hmmm. If the crow cries "kicked," has he been kicked or does he just want corn?
If a crow cries "kicked", or actually any other sound known to the human ear, I'm going to assume he would like a seven-course meal.

Hallo!!Why I am kicked for Live Chess???What a problem??