"One player managed to earn the win"

Is this supposed to be helpful?

An example of the amazing AI Chess.com is using?

Apart from anything else, the results the "Checking for mistakes" returns are different from those in the subsequent analysis.

"One player managed to earn the win" Dear Chess.com, I already  realised this.

I got the impression that it was intended as a snide jab at the quality of play during the game.

It's like a one-sentence description of how the game unfolded (that particular one is the least helpful). But I don't think it's supposed to be snide - I get that message for relatively decent games (where the evaluation doesn't jump around wildly).

One game I had where both of us were playing just terribly got the comment "A chaotic game with both players missing chances to win."

Another game where I played badly got "One player dominated the whole game."

Etc.

That gets rid of the box...the text still remains.  I don't mind that as much but still.  Thanks for figuring this out.  A lot.

What nonsense! What is it advertising?

one player managed to earn the win means that one of the players was considerably more dominant during the game

and mentioned by speeduptheserver, there are others as well

I changed my language to Spanish because I'm learning Spanish, and these messages are translated: "Una partida caótica en la que ambos jugadores han tenido oportunidades de ganar."

These game summaries are designed to quell mutiny; a real player knows these so called descriptions don't at all describe the game's events.  These sentences are put there so people who were engined second guess themselves and don't report it.  I play gambits and the thing says "Good Comeback Win" As IF, i KNOW I was winning the whole freaking time; as if +1 tells any story whatsoever.  Yeah they were winning at +1 but got mated, smh.